Not a secret offshore account or a shell company — Italy’s investigators say the hiding spot was carved directly into Bitcoin.
Italy’s Economic and Financial Police Unit in Foggia recently unraveled a tax-fraud scheme worth roughly €1 million (about $1.1 million) in undeclared capital gains that relied on Bitcoin inscriptions. According to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, the suspect used the Ordinals protocol and the BRC-20 token standard to mint tokens, list them on marketplaces, sell them at large markups, and funnel profits back into a primary Bitcoin wallet. Those proceeds were repeatedly turned into new inscriptions, creating a loop that moved money while avoiding traditional tax records.
How the tech was used
- Ordinals, introduced in 2023, assigns a serial number to individual satoshis (the smallest unit of Bitcoin) and allows arbitrary data — images, text, etc. — to be inscribed in a Bitcoin transaction.
- BRC-20 builds on that capability by enabling the deployment, minting, and transfer of token-like assets directly on Bitcoin.
Chainalysis says the suspect exploited these tools to create perceived on-chain value, monetize it through sales, and reinvest proceeds into fresh inscriptions — a cycle intended to obscure taxable gains.
A wider pattern
Tax-motivated schemes in crypto aren’t new, but the methods are evolving. Chainalysis notes increasing use of NFTs, DeFi protocols, and emerging token standards to hide wealth. Compliance studies back up the concern: a March study found just 32% to 56% of U.S. crypto owners report gains to tax authorities, while a separate August 2024 analysis put Norway’s reporting rate at only 12%. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service estimates the gross tax gap — taxes legally owed but not collected — at roughly $606 billion.
Why this case matters
Despite the technical creativity, Chainalysis emphasizes a fundamental weakness of using blockchains for secrecy: transactions are permanently recorded. Blockchain intelligence tools can reconstruct transaction networks and cross-reference them with data disclosures from exchanges, making it possible to trace flows back to suspected tax evasion. The Foggia case underscores that novelty in token design doesn’t automatically equal anonymity.
As new digital-asset standards keep appearing and generating revenue, analysts say the mismatch between what’s visible on-chain and what’s declared for tax purposes will increasingly attract scrutiny from investigators worldwide.
(Featured image: Tax Central; chart: TradingView)
Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
