Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.44T
Market Cap
$2.44T
24h Trading Volume
$91.53B
BTC Dominance
56.64%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Shiba Inu Slides 35% to $0.000006 as Shibarium Fallout and Exchange Inflows Erode Confidence
Shiba Inu’s slide continued into April, with the meme coin down roughly 35% year-over-year and trading near $0.000006 — well below the roughly $0.00000923 it reached in early January. The token has been in an extended three-month decline that accelerated over the recent weekend, and several converging factors help explain why a swift recovery looks uncertain. Shibarium troubles sap SHIB’s fundamentals A key headwind for SHIB is weakness on its own Layer‑2 network, Shibarium. Since the network’s August 2023 launch, SHIB’s price has been closely tied to user interest and activity on Shibarium. On‑chain metrics, however, show that activity has cratered: the decline began after a major attack in September 2025 that not only produced direct losses but also eroded user confidence. Where daily transactions once numbered in the millions, they have plunged to the low thousands. Shibariumscan reports roughly 1,230 daily transactions over the past 24 hours, with activity dipping as low as 557 on April 4. Developers recently pushed a major infrastructure upgrade — a full reindexing of backend systems — which may have temporarily reduced throughput in the short term. But the longer-term damage from the attack and the sustained fall in user engagement remain the bigger challenges for SHIB’s narrative. Derivatives, exchange flows point to fading trader confidence Market participants are also pulling back in derivatives markets. Open interest across major exchanges fell to $54.25 million, down about 16% from $65.23 million a month earlier and a steep 63% from the $145.40 million peak seen in January, according to Coinglass. Lower open interest typically signals traders closing positions and reduced speculative appetite. At the same time, on‑chain exchange inflows have ticked up — an often bearish sign. CryptoQuant data shows a net flow of +6.9 billion SHIB to exchanges in the past 24 hours (more SHIB entering platforms than leaving), and at one point that netflow spiked to 39 billion SHIB within 24 hours. Large inflows to exchanges often precede selling pressure if holders opt to liquidate. Broader meme‑coin weakness compounds problems SHIB’s struggles are not isolated. The meme‑coin segment as a whole has contracted sharply: total market capitalization for meme coins stands at about $34 billion, down from a year‑to‑date high north of $109.7 billion, per Coingecko. That wider pullback reduces tailwinds for high‑beta assets like SHIB. Outlook Taken together — weaker Shibarium activity after the September 2025 attack, a recent infrastructure reindex that may have temporarily depressed throughput, falling derivatives open interest, rising exchange inflows, and broad meme‑coin depreciation — the path to a sustained SHIB rebound looks challenging. Recovery will likely depend on renewed on‑chain activity on Shibarium, a restoration of trader confidence, and a healthier macro backdrop for meme assets. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Ethereum Reclaims $2,100 — Thin Binance Liquidity Makes Rally Fragile
Ethereum has climbed back above $2,100 — but don’t let the headline price recovery fool you. The market that pushed ETH higher is noticeably thinner than it has been all year, and that changes how meaningful this move really is. What the data says - CryptoQuant’s on-chain snapshot of Binance shows a liquidity ratio around 5.01 — the weakest reading since the start of 2026. - 30-day cumulative turnover on Binance has slid to about 16.65 million ETH, well below the 20–25 million ETH monthly flow that marked Ethereum’s busiest trading periods in 2025. - Exchange reserves on Binance remain roughly 3.32 million ETH and have not materially declined. Why that matters - The price regained $2,100 on much lighter activity. When volume and participation fall, the same price level carries less conviction: it’s more reactive, more fragile, and more vulnerable to a single large order swinging the market. - Crucially, this is not a supply-drain story. The ETH is still on Binance; what’s evaporated is the trading activity around that supply. In short: inventory is present, participants are not. - Historically, stretches of low activity with stable reserves have preceded big moves — in either direction. The market is therefore “coiled”: quiet now, but set up for an amplified response once activity returns. Technical picture - ETH is trading near $2,150, just above the 200-week moving average — a key long-term support level that separates a bullish structure from deeper downside risk. - A prior rejection in the $4,000–$4,500 zone formed a decisive lower high and began the slide that cost ETH its 50- and 100-week moving averages, which are flattening and tilting down. - The recent bounce from below $2,000 was sharp but lacked follow-through: ETH reclaimed $2,100 yet remains below the 100-week average and is struggling to overcome the 50-week MA. Volume patterns show reactive spikes on sell-offs and quieter rebounds, implying sellers still hold greater conviction. - Tactical levels to watch: a sustained weekly close below the 200-week MA would materially weaken structure and open the path to lower supports; reclaiming $2,600–$2,800 is likely needed to re-establish a more constructive trend. Bottom line The number is constructive — $2,100 is back — but the underlying infrastructure is fragile. Stable reserves and eroded participation create a market that can move sharply once traders return. Keep an eye on liquidity metrics (liquidity ratio, turnover, exchange reserves) and weekly closes around the 200-week MA; they’ll tell you whether this recovery is the start of a durable rebound or a short-lived, volume-light rally. Sources: CryptoQuant (liquidity and turnover data), TradingView (price and moving averages). Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Remi's Speculative Thesis: Japan Yield Rise Could Push XRP to $50-$150 - $1,000 Upside
Crypto commentator Remi has laid out a bullish — and highly speculative — case for how a rising Japanese 10-year bond yield could help propel XRP toward eye-popping price targets. Why the Japanese bond move matters Remi flagged recent increases in Japan’s 10-year yield and argued this trend could push the Bank of Japan (BOJ) to lift interest rates. That, he says, would rattle a large group of borrowers who locked in ultra-low, near-0% financing in Japan. If those borrowers rush to sell assets to cover higher borrowing costs, Remi warns this could trigger a liquidity crunch — and a reverse carry trade that he believes would funnel capital into XRP. How that fuels XRP According to Remi, the unwind of yen-funded carry trades would make XRP uniquely attractive and could drive prices into a wide target range of $50 to $150 — what he calls the “price before law.” He added that XRP could reach $100 before the U.S. CLARITY Act is passed, and even suggested that if U.S. political authorities “green-light” the move, the sequence could play out in days. He also alleged (without independent confirmation) that some Japanese banks are waiting for the CLARITY Act before adopting XRP more fully in Japan. Bigger upside scenarios — and the caveats Remi pushed the rhetoric further in a separate post, pointing to XRP’s 2017-style rally (when the token jumped tens of thousands of percent) and arguing that a repeat could lift XRP to $1,000 — an assumption that would require an enormous multi-thousand-percent gain. He called a $1,000 target “conservative” if you add factors like FOMO, institutional flows, ETFs, real utility and potential supply shocks. Risk management and reality check Remi counseled traders to take profits at intervals and warned that “anything can go wrong.” His scenario hinges on several conditional events — BOJ policy shifts, large-scale deleveraging of yen-funded positions, geopolitical energy pressures and regulatory developments like the CLARITY Act — any of which may or may not occur. These remain speculative and market outcomes are far from certain. Market snapshot At the time of writing, XRP was trading around $1.33, up roughly 2% in the last 24 hours, per CoinMarketCap. Bottom line Remi’s thesis blends macro bond dynamics, geopolitical risk, and crypto-market mechanics into a dramatic narrative for XRP. It’s a high-conviction, high-uncertainty scenario: potentially lucrative if the pieces align, but dependent on multiple unpredictable global events. Traders should treat it as one speculative view among many and manage risk accordingly. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
'World-First' Crypto Resort in Timor-Leste Implodes, Tied to Sanctioned Scam Network
A dream of private jets, luxury villas and a “world‑first” crypto resort on Timor‑Leste’s coastline has collapsed into questions about shadowy ties to a sanctioned scam network — and a warning about how quickly crypto hype can intersect with transnational crime. What was promised Promotional material released last June billed the AB Digital Technology Resort as a futuristic, beachfront complex where blockchain entrepreneurs and investors would meet in luxury — with a share of profits earmarked for philanthropy. But when reporters from the Guardian and OCCRP visited the proposed site near Dili airport in February, they found an empty, scrubby plot behind a barbed‑wire fence. The resort’s online marketing has since been removed. How the story unfolded A four‑month joint investigation by the Guardian and the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project pieced together corporate filings, flight manifests, messages and photos to probe who was behind the project and whether it had links to a Cambodia‑based conglomerate, Prince Holding Group — which U.S. authorities have accused of running large‑scale online scam operations across Southeast Asia. Crucially, the AB network itself has not been accused of criminality. But three individuals who briefly worked on the Timor‑Leste project — Yang Jian, Yang Yanming and Shih Ting‑yu — were sanctioned by U.S. authorities in October for their alleged involvement in another luxury‑resort development tied to entities said to be controlled by Prince Group. None of the three have been charged, and all were removed from the Timor‑Leste venture after the sanctions. Who the key players are - Lin Xiaofan (“Frank”): A Guangdong‑born businessman who presented himself publicly as the face of the AB resort and as a representative of the AB Charity Foundation. President José Ramos‑Horta said Lin visited Timor‑Leste frequently, facilitated donations such as laptops and medical supplies, and was made a special adviser — a role that led the president to request a diplomatic passport for Lin. Lin told investigators he is not sanctioned, denied ties to Prince Group, described himself as an “initiator” rather than a formal officer of the AB entities, and said he dismissed the three sanctioned associates when the U.S. actions were announced. - The AB ecosystem: Confusingly structured, it includes AB DAO (a community DAO, not a legal entity), AB Chain (an open‑source blockchain), and two AB foundations — one registered in Ireland and another in the Cayman Islands. The Irish foundation lists former Irish prime minister Bertie Ahern as a co‑director and chair; Ahern has denied authorizing or knowing about quoted statements or donations attributed to the foundation. - Prince Holding Group and Chen Zhi: The Cambodian conglomerate was designated by the U.S. Treasury in October and its founder, Chen Zhi, was later indicted by U.S. authorities on charges including wire fraud and money laundering. U.S. officials allege the group operated forced‑labour scam compounds running industrial‑scale cyber fraud — “pig‑butchering” schemes that use romance and investment scams to extract cryptocurrency and cash from victims. Prince Group and Chen have denied the allegations. Allegations, denials and missing links Investigators found a pattern of mixed claims and removals: website pages and team bios were deleted after inquiries began; a promotional quote attributed to a former Balkan president was dropped; and one individual once listed as a spokesman denied any formal role. Lin and other AB representatives say a preliminary memorandum of understanding with the Irish AB Foundation — which had proposed directing 5–10% of resort profits to charity — was terminated in November and that no funds changed hands. Yang Jian had been listed as the majority shareholder of AB Digital Technology Resort LDA when it was registered in June 2025 but was removed from company records days after U.S. sanctions related to a separate project in Palau. Yang Yanming and Shih were said to have been hired on the Timor project and later dismissed; they deny wrongdoing. Why this matters for Timor‑Leste and crypto Timor‑Leste, an island nation with limited regulatory capacity and new laws legalising offshore online gambling, has become a target for concern among U.N. officials and its own leaders. In September a senior minister warned the country could become “an amusement park for transnational crime syndicates,” calling for reviews of diplomatic and work passports issued to non‑citizens. The president told investigators he had grown sceptical of the resort from the start and that he would cancel Lin’s diplomatic credentials if ties to Prince Group were proven. For the crypto sector the episode is a cautionary tale: fast‑moving promotional narratives, complex corporate structures (DAOs, chains, offshore foundations) and high‑status endorsements can mask weak due diligence and regulatory blind spots. It also underscores how fraud models that use messaging, social engineering and crypto rails — commonly called pig‑butchering — can be connected to physical infrastructure like so‑called scam compounds. What’s unresolved The beachfront site remains undeveloped. Shareholders in the Timor‑Leste company insist the project will go ahead, but investigators and some officials say no serious business plans or feasibility studies were ever produced for public scrutiny. The AB entities and certain named individuals dispute any criminal links and maintain some cooperative relationships were charitable or preliminary. The investigation by the Guardian and OCCRP is part of a broader probe into how transnational fraud operations exploit emerging markets and crypto hype. The companies and people named have made various denials or offered limited responses; some have been sanctioned by U.S. authorities, others not. Bottom line A high‑gloss crypto resort pitch in one of the world’s poorest countries has exposed tangled corporate webs, diplomatic favors and alleged ties to a sanctioned network accused of running large‑scale online scams. As regulators and investigators tighten scrutiny on crypto‑adjacent projects, the episode highlights the need for greater transparency, local safeguards and thorough due diligence — by governments, investors and the crypto community alike. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Whale Move: $82M ETH Exits FalconX — Arkham Points to Bitmine
Someone just pulled about $82 million worth of ETH out of an institutional prime broker — and on-chain sleuths are already pointing fingers. What happened - Arkham Intelligence flagged a large withdrawal in the last hour: roughly $82 million in ETH leaving FalconX, an institutional prime brokerage that serves hedge funds, corporate treasuries and other sophisticated market players. FalconX is not a retail exchange, so this wasn’t a retail cash-out or an exchange-flown sale — it was ETH leaving institutional custody and moving into a wallet controlled by the recipient. Why that matters - A withdrawal from FalconX is not the same as placing an order on an exchange. It’s accumulation: the asset is being taken out of an institutional custody/settlement venue and put under direct control, which usually signals a holder intends to keep or stake the coins rather than immediately sell them. At Ethereum’s current price around $2,150, that’s a sizeable vote of confidence. Who might be behind it - Arkham’s forensic signals go further than the raw transaction: the route, sizing, timing and signature patterns of the new wallet match the known behavior of Bitmine, the digital-asset treasury firm led by Tom Lee. That match is not a definitive ID — on-chain attribution of fresh wallets is never certain — but it’s the strongest signal short of direct confirmation. If Bitmine is indeed the actor, it’s consistent with the company’s recent, aggressive program of institutional ETH accumulation and staking. Broader context on supply dynamics - Bitmine (if this is them) has been moving large sums of ETH off liquid markets and into staking contracts. That reduces available supply and can have an outsized effect on market dynamics when repeated over time. An additional $82 million exiting institutional custody and presumably being committed to staking would be another incremental, potentially permanent removal of tradable ETH. Price action and technical backdrop - Ethereum is trying to hold above $2,150 after reclaiming the $2,100 area, but the daily structure still looks like recovery rather than a clear trend reversal. February’s decisive breakdown erased the $2,600–$2,800 zone and drove price below $2,000, resetting positioning and establishing a range between roughly $1,900 and $2,300. ETH’s recent bounce has been constructive but incomplete: - Price remains below the 50-, 100- and 200-day moving averages, all trending downward and forming layered resistance. - Volume has faded compared with the sell-off, suggesting buyers aren’t yet matching the conviction seen in the down move. - The key levels to watch are $2,300 (a clean reclaim would open a path toward $2,600) and $2,100 (failure to hold risks another test of the $1,900 base). Bottom line - A roughly $82 million ETH withdrawal from an institutional venue is a notable on-chain event, and Arkham’s pattern match points to a repeat of the same institutional accumulation-and-stake behavior we’ve observed from Bitmine. That kind of demand-driven supply reduction matters, but shorter-term price direction still depends on reclaiming higher resistance and a return of conviction from buyers. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
James Wynn Liquidated for Sixth Time in Two Weeks as Bitcoin Breaks Higher
Headline: Notorious high‑leverage trader James Wynn liquidated again as Bitcoin breaks higher — sixth wipeout in two weeks James Wynn, the high‑profile trader known for pushing extreme leverage, has been liquidated again after Bitcoin’s rally — marking his sixth forced wipeout in roughly two weeks. On‑chain data shared today by Lookonchain and viewable via Hypurrscan shows Wynn’s Hyperliquid wallet was force‑closed at about $68,000 per BTC. The incident is the latest in a string of painful margin calls: Lookonchain’s post notes this was the sixth forced closure tied to that wallet over the past fortnight, on top of at least 194 historical liquidations tracked to the same account. A pattern of risk-on, high‑leverage bets Wynn rose to public prominence in 2025 after stringing together massive perp bets that, at one peak, reportedly put his Hyperliquid account more than $80 million in profit. He was an early backer of $PEPE and was later infamously on the wrong side of a 40x Bitcoin long that ballooned to an enormous notional size — reports put that exposure around $1.2–1.25 billion — with a liquidation price only a few thousand dollars below spot. Rather than pulling back, Wynn continued using the same aggressive playbook. In late May and early June 2025 he reportedly suffered a run that included at least nine liquidations in a single wallet and cumulative losses approaching $22 million. By year‑end, analysts and articles were using his account as a case study in the dangers of casino‑level leverage. Since mid‑March 2026 he’s leaned into fresh 40x BTC shorts again, opening exposures in the roughly $44k–$190k notional range. That leaves virtually no margin for error: at 40x, a 2–3% adverse move is often enough to trigger full liquidation. Wynn’s positions were repeatedly taken out by modest rallies — including a wipeout on March 25 and multiple 40x shorts destroyed by small price upticks by month‑end. Why Wynn’s blowups matter Beyond the drama, Wynn’s recurring liquidations underscore a structural dynamic in the current market: crowded short positioning plus high leverage creates ideal conditions for short squeezes. Traders and bots often monitor large, repeat offenders like Wynn as sentiment indicators — when he shorts into strength, those entries can become fuel for the moves that take him out. Lookonchain has repeatedly flagged Wynn’s activity this year, including a February tweet showing large BTC deposits tied to the trader (8,200 BTC, roughly $559 million), alleging correlation with price drops after such moves. The takeaway for traders is simple: in a trending Bitcoin market, hyper‑leverage and aggressive sizing can turn ordinary rallies into catastrophic margin calls. Wynn’s sixth liquidation in two weeks is a fresh reminder that big accounts can still be humbled when leverage, timing and price momentum collide. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news