Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.39T
Market Cap
$2.39T
24h Trading Volume
$48.20B
BTC Dominance
56.25%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Blumenthal Demands Binance Records After Reports Tie $1.7B in Crypto Flows to Iran
Sen. Richard Blumenthal intensifies pressure on Binance after reports tie far larger crypto flows to Iran than the exchange previously disclosed. In a follow‑up letter sent April 1 to Binance co‑CEO Richard Teng, the Connecticut Democrat told the exchange it must explain apparent discrepancies between its testimony to the Senate and recent reporting that linked Binance‑connected accounts to Iran. Blumenthal said the differences raise “further alarms about its candor and compliance with Congressional oversight” and demanded the documents and records Binance used to prepare its earlier responses. What sparked the push - Investigations by Fortune and The New York Times traced roughly $1.7 billion in flows from Binance‑linked accounts to entities with ties to Iran — a figure far above the $110,000 Binance disclosed last year for direct transactions with four major Iranian exchanges. - The senator pointed to that gap, plus what he described as partial or delayed production of materials to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), as grounds for deeper probing. What Blumenthal is asking for Blumenthal’s letter lays out detailed questions and document requests, including: - Whether any Binance accounts sent or received funds to or from a set of Iran‑linked wallets named in the media reports, and the wallet addresses for those links. - A year‑over‑year accounting of transactions between Binance and known Iranian exchanges. - An explanation of how Binance calculated the $110,000 figure, including whether it counted transfers that were later tied to Iranian exchanges. - Exact dates for when implicated companies and individuals opened Binance accounts, began sending funds to Iranian intermediaries, were reported to U.S. law enforcement, and when they were suspended or removed — plus explanations for any delays in action. Compliance and internal conduct under scrutiny Blumenthal also pressed Binance on internal controls and employee treatment: - Whether Binance has removed, weakened, or relaxed detection, screening, freezing, or reporting tools since Jan. 1, 2025 — including systems designed to spot illicit or indirect transfers. - Whether the exchange has declined to investigate, suspend, or remove accounts tied to people inside Iran, including accounts accessed via VPNs or so‑called “drop accounts” (KYC‑verified accounts bought, shared, or stolen). - Whether Binance ever disciplined compliance staff who raised concerns internally or shared information with law enforcement or external partners — citing reports that employees were dismissed for “unauthorized disclosure.” - He also highlighted internal tags reportedly used on some accounts, such as “Don’t block. Internal accounts,” saying such labels should have triggered greater, not lesser, scrutiny. Allegations of slow responses to law enforcement The letter criticizes what Blumenthal called delayed or inadequate responses to law enforcement warnings: - He alleges Binance took two months to respond to warnings about alleged terrorist financing by entities such as Hexa Whale, and another two months to remove an implicated shell entity. - He also claimed it took at least five months for Binance to remove Blessed Trust as a vendor after warnings about suspected terrorist financing. Deadline and next steps Invoking Senate rules, Blumenthal gave Binance until April 14 to turn over the requested records. The exchange now faces intensified Congressional scrutiny as lawmakers seek to reconcile its public testimony with investigative reporting and probe whether internal practices failed to stop risky flows tied to Iran. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
XRP at Critical Demand Zone: $451M Spot Buys vs $1.5B Shorts — Short Squeeze Risk
XRP is parked at a critical demand zone — and the market beneath the price is telling a story of two very different convictions. On one side, real money is quietly accumulating. CryptoQuant data shows Binance spot CVD (cumulative volume delta) has climbed to about $451 million: actual buy-side capital exchanged for XRP, signaling buyers who are putting cash behind the current price. On the other side, derivatives traders are decidedly bearish. Binance perpetual CVD sits near -$1.5 billion, while All CEX perpetual CVD is roughly -$1 billion. That means leveraged traders are heavily positioned for a drop, with nearly $1.5 billion of negative cumulative positioning concentrated on Binance perps alone. Key metrics - Binance spot CVD: +$451M (buy-side) - Binance perpetual CVD: ≈ -$1.5B (bearish) - All CEX perpetual CVD: ≈ -$1B (bearish) Two markets, two verdicts: spot buyers are absorbing the selling pressure that leveraged shorts expect to create. That setup isn’t neutral — it’s structurally unstable. If spot demand continues to soak up sell-side flow, the supply available to push XRP lower will shrink. At some point, crowded bearish leverage can flip from a headwind into fuel: forced liquidations of short positions add buying pressure, producing a short squeeze even without a new fundamental catalyst. CryptoQuant also flags liquidation activity as evidence that derivatives exposure is fragile. But important nuance: this is not an outright bullish confirmation. It’s a “pre-bullish” structure — spot support forming underneath a market that leveraged traders still bet against. That distinction matters for timing and risk management. The roughly $1.95 billion gap between the $451M of spot buying and the $1.5B of bearish futures is the distance between current balance and potential forced reaction; if the gap widens with continued spot accumulation, bearish derivatives could become the market’s accelerant. The price picture remains cautious. XRP is trading near $1.31 after failing to reclaim higher levels since February’s capitulation. The token has been making lower highs and lower lows, caught in a consolidation band roughly between $1.25 and $1.50. Volume has declined through this phase, reflecting reduced participation and weak conviction from buyers — repeated failures to hold moves above ~$1.40 underscore that dynamic. Technical context - 50-day and 100-day moving averages are trending down and sit above price, acting as resistance. - 200-day moving average remains well above current levels, reinforcing the broader bearish structure. - Lower volume in consolidation suggests a lack of bullish follow-through. What to watch next: continued growth in spot demand vs. the size of bearish perp positioning (and any liquidation spikes). If spot CVD keeps rising and the derivative gap widens, the risk of a squeeze increases. Conversely, unless XRP reclaims key moving averages and breaks the $1.25–$1.50 range with conviction, the prevailing structure favors more downward pressure and a possible retest of lower supports. Bottom line: beneath the quiet price action, a tug-of-war is unfolding between real buyers and heavily shorted derivatives positions. That clash could resolve into a sharp move either way — but for now it’s a pre-bullish setup, not a bullish verdict. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin’s Decentralization Myth: 68% of Mining Power in US, China & Russia
Bitcoin’s supposed global decentralization looks a lot less uniform when you follow the miners. While anyone can technically run a miner, the network’s hashpower is heavily concentrated in a handful of pools and regions, analyst Lucky noted on X. Current estimates put roughly 68% of Bitcoin mining power in just three countries: the United States, China and Russia. That isn’t accidental — it’s driven by real-world advantages: power availability, infrastructure, capital access and regulatory environments. How the leaders stack up - United States: Institutional-scale miners, deep access to capital markets and clearer state-level rules (Texas often cited) have pushed the U.S. to the front of the pack. - China: Despite the formal bans, Chinese-based hashpower persists through relocated or underground operations, often buoyed by cheap hydro and coal energy. - Russia: Low-cost electricity and naturally cooler climates lower operating costs and cooling needs, making mining economically attractive. Why this matters Hashpower concentration doesn’t erase Bitcoin’s permissionless architecture, but it does concentrate economic and geopolitical influence. Where miners cluster affects network resilience, censorship risk and who can exert de facto control in moments of crisis. Tracking hashpower distribution therefore gives a clearer picture of where Bitcoin’s on-chain influence actually lies. Tariff talk and market fallout — whales, liquidations and geopolitical risk U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a fresh set of tariffs — a 25% levy on the full value of goods that use imported steel and aluminum. Crypto commentator Sjuul AltCryptoGems flagged on X that prior tariff shocks coincided with sharp crypto sell-offs, and noted that the current backdrop of war raises uncertainty further. If disputes escalate into broader conflict, Sjuul warned, volatility across risk assets including crypto could spike. Market dynamics quickly reflected that unease. As tensions involving Iran surfaced, Crypto Seth reported that large Bitcoin holders (whales) were placing resistance to cap price moves above $70,000 during the U.S. trading session and used the news as a trigger to push prices lower. The result was a massive wave of forced exits: about 185,806 traders were liquidated, with losses near $406.52 million. Crypto Seth argued these were not random liquidations but targeted squeezes that caught many 100x leveraged “Degen” longs offside. Meanwhile, heatmap data show short leverage building above the $69,000 level, suggesting traders were positioning for further downside. Bottom line Bitcoin remains permissionless, but the mining landscape and short-term price action are shaped by geography, energy economics, policy and large market players. For traders and observers, that means watching where hashpower sits and how geopolitical and policy moves interact with whale behavior — both can quickly change market dynamics. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Trump names Todd Blanche acting AG — architect of DOJ’s crypto enforcement rollback
President Trump has removed Attorney General Pam Bondi and installed Todd Blanche as acting U.S. Attorney General — a move that hands control of the Justice Department to the official who, in April 2025, dismantled the DOJ’s dedicated crypto enforcement effort and told prosecutors to rethink how they pursue digital-asset cases. What happened - Bondi confirmed her exit in an April 2 post on X, saying she would “work tirelessly to transition the office of Attorney General to the amazing Todd Blanche” before moving to the private sector. NBC News reports she was fired amid the president’s frustration over her handling of key priorities. - Trump announced the change on Truth Social, calling Blanche a “very talented and respected Legal Mind.” The White House has not set a timeline for a permanent nominee; reports say EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin is under consideration. Why Blanche matters to crypto Blanche, who was Deputy Attorney General when the April 2025 memo was issued, authored the directive that formally disbanded the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET). His memo stated plainly that the DOJ “is not a digital assets regulator,” criticized the prior administration’s approach as a “reckless strategy of regulation by prosecution,” and ordered prosecutors to stop targeting exchanges, mixers, and offline wallets for ordinary end‑user behavior. Instead, enforcement was refocused on prosecutions of individuals who directly defraud investors. Reactions and risks The decision to shutter the NCET drew swift criticism from Democratic lawmakers, who warned the shift could make it easier to evade sanctions, enable drug‑trafficking finance, and permit large‑scale financial fraud. With Blanche now leading the DOJ, those enforcement priorities look set to continue — and become harder to reverse institutionally even after a future permanent AG is named. Conflict-of-interest scrutiny Blanche also reportedly holds as much as $485,000 in personal digital‑asset investments — a disclosure that is likely to attract congressional scrutiny now that he oversees the nation’s top law‑enforcement agency. What this means for the crypto industry - Short term: Exchanges and service providers may welcome continued DOJ de‑emphasis on structural enforcement against platforms and infrastructure, potentially reducing the risk of broad prosecutions that target operational features. - Long term: The absence of a centralized crypto enforcement unit and the DOJ’s narrowed focus could complicate cross‑border coordination and investigations into systemic misuse of crypto networks. - Political oversight: Congressional Democrats and other watchdogs are likely to press Blanche on both policy choices and his personal holdings, increasing legislative scrutiny even as enforcement priorities shift. Bottom line Trump’s appointment of Blanche signals continuity — and possible reinforcement — of the DOJ’s pivot away from aggressive, structural prosecutions in crypto. For industry participants, the change offers a more permissive enforcement posture in some areas but also raises the prospect of sustained political and congressional pushback, particularly around illicit finance and conflicts of interest. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Whales and Sharks Realize Heavy Losses — On‑Chain Data Signals Large-Holder Capitulation
On-chain data show big Bitcoin holders are actively taking losses, a sign of capitulation among large investors. Glassnode: sharks and whales realizing heavy losses On X, on-chain analytics firm Glassnode highlighted a sharp uptick in Bitcoin “Realized Loss” among the market’s largest players — the so-called sharks (100–1,000 BTC) and whales (1,000–10,000 BTC). Realized Loss measures the dollar value of coins being spent at a loss (i.e., sold for less than their purchase price), and is a direct read on loss-taking behavior. Glassnode’s chart shows the 7-day simple moving average (SMA) of combined realized losses for these cohorts has recently sat at elevated levels — currently above $200 million per day. Loss spikes were especially pronounced after the price crashes in November and February, underlining the scale of pain experienced by large holders. “Typical capitulation behaviour from larger entities,” the firm noted. Why this matters Large-cap selling matters because sharks and whales control substantial supply. Historically, intense capitulation—when weaker-handed holders sell into falling prices—can accelerate the transfer of coins to stronger, more patient hands and has often marked bottoms in past cycles. Whether the current wave of loss-taking is extreme enough to constitute a definitive market bottom remains unclear. Halving milestone and market backdrop In a separate update, Glassnode pointed out that Bitcoin is approaching the halfway mark to the next halving. The midpoint occurs at block 945,000; the chain currently sits at block 943,495. The next halving, which will cut miner block subsidies in half, is estimated for April 2028. Market price Bitcoin’s price has been consolidating near $67,000 as these on-chain dynamics play out. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
US F-15 Shot Down Over Iran; Bitcoin Clings to $67K as Oil Spike Threatens Crypto
Headline: US F-15 shot down over Iran — Bitcoin holds near $67k as geopolitical risk spikes A U.S. F-15 fighter jet was shot down over Iran on April 3, with one crew member rescued and President Trump formally briefed, escalating a conflict that has already weighed heavily on risk assets — including Bitcoin. Iranian state media published photos of the downed jet that CNN’s analysis matched to an F-15. The White House press secretary confirmed the president had been briefed; live coverage was updated at 1:12 p.m. EDT. Market impact on crypto - Bitcoin (BTC) was trading near $67,000 at the time of reporting, modestly down on the day but still more than 40% below its October 2025 all-time high. - BTC has repeatedly tested the $65k–$67k zone as a key support range during periods of U.S.–Iran tension. Major spikes lower have come only after clear escalations — initial U.S. strikes earlier in the conflict sent Bitcoin briefly to about $63,000 before stabilization. - The incident occurred on Good Friday, with U.S. equity markets closed for the Easter holiday, leaving offshore markets to react first. Macro channels to watch - Oil is already trading above $100 per barrel amid a closure in the Strait of Hormuz; Asian market openings could push oil markedly higher. A sustained oil rally would stoke inflation concerns and shrink the Federal Reserve’s room to cut interest rates — a combination that is a clear headwind for crypto prices. - Political signaling is mixed: on X, Trump suggested the Strait of Hormuz “could be reopened with a little more time,” which markets read as leaving room for negotiated de-escalation even as U.S. officials have signaled ongoing military pressure. In a White House address on April 2 he said U.S. forces were in the “final stages” of the campaign and warned of further strikes. What matters for Bitcoin next - The most important potential catalyst for a sustained BTC recovery would be credible de-escalation that reopens the Strait of Hormuz and pushes oil back below $100. Until then, heightened geopolitical risk and higher energy prices are likely to keep downward pressure on crypto sentiment and price action. Bottom line: Watch oil and developments from the Middle East — those two variables will likely determine whether Bitcoin can hold its current support zone or slip into a deeper correction. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news