Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.55T
Market Cap
$2.55T
24h Trading Volume
$87.51B
BTC Dominance
57.26%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
XRP's $1.39 Rally a 'Wave 2' Trap — Analyst Predicts Swift Drop Toward $1.09
XRP’s pop to $1.39 on April 8 looked like a breath of fresh air for bulls — but according to crypto analyst CasiTrades, it may have been nothing more than a setup for a larger drop. What happened - The brief spike followed a Pakistan-brokered ceasefire between the US and Iran, which triggered short-liquidations across crypto markets and pushed sentiment from extreme fear toward cautious optimism. - XRP reached roughly $1.39 before easing back to about $1.32. CasiTrades’ take - CasiTrades, who has been charting XRP’s wave structure, says the rally completed a corrective Wave 2 rather than signaling a trend reversal. - The bounce stalled near the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement zone (roughly $1.35–$1.40), which she interprets as confirmation of a clean Wave 2 in an Elliott Wave count. - With Wave 2 likely finished, she expects the next phase to be a Wave 3 impulse to the downside — typically the fastest and most powerful leg in an Elliott sequence. Projected path and targets - Her one-hour chart projection outlines a five-wave impulsive decline: - Primary Wave 3 target: around $1.09 (near a 0.618 retracement). - Expected Wave 4 bounce: roughly $1.20. - Potential Wave 5 continuation: with deeper structural targets at the 0.786 extension (~$1.0854) and the 0.854 extension (~$0.862) if the move fully plays out. Macro context - Two bullish catalysts could blunt this bearish scenario: the CLARITY Act markup slated for the second half of April and further progress on the Iran ceasefire. - Conversely, if the CLARITY Act stalls or the conflict persists, CasiTrades warns that $1.30 support could break, opening the door to deeper losses. Bottom line - What looked like a short-lived rally may instead have been the chart’s way of completing a corrective phase. Traders should watch the 0.618 Fibonacci zone, the $1.30 support, and upcoming macro headlines — any of which could confirm whether the anticipated Wave 3 downside is next. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
StarkWare’s "Quantum Safe Bitcoin": No‑Fork Quantum Defense for BTC — Expensive, Limited
Headline: StarkWare proposes “Quantum Safe Bitcoin” — a no-protocol-change patch that could blunt future quantum attacks, with big caveats StarkWare’s chief product officer Avihu Levy has outlined a novel way to make new Bitcoin transfers resistant to quantum attacks without changing the Bitcoin protocol. Called Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB), the proposal swaps ECDSA’s elliptic-curve math for a hash-to-signature puzzle that can be enforced inside Bitcoin’s existing legacy script limits — meaning it would not require a soft fork. How QSB works (short version) - Instead of creating a conventional elliptic-curve signature, QSB requires the sender to find an input whose hash output looks like a valid ECDSA signature. - That search is brute-force work (GPU compute), not the number-theory structure that quantum algorithms such as Shor’s are expected to break. - Because QSB fits within Bitcoin’s legacy scripting rules, it could be used today for new transactions without changing the protocol itself. Why proponents are excited - StarkWare CEO Eli Ben‑Sasson called the paper “huge,” arguing QSB “essentially makes Bitcoin quantum-safe today” because transactions created under QSB would remain resilient even if a quantum computer capable of breaking conventional signatures appeared. - The approach is pragmatic: it doesn’t try to redesign Bitcoin, but instead bolts on a narrow, localized defense that users could opt into. Key limitations and criticisms - Cost and practicality: Levy’s scheme is computationally expensive. The researchers estimate GPU compute costs in the range of about $75–$150 per transaction, which makes QSB impractical for routine payments and realistic mainly for large-value transfers. - Coverage gaps: QSB protects only new transfers that use the scheme. It does not retroactively protect exposed public keys or dormant wallets. Bitcoin specialist Daniel Batten notes this omission is significant — early P2PK addresses alone may hold roughly 1.7 million BTC that would remain vulnerable if a sufficiently powerful quantum computer appeared. - Nonstandard and non-scalable: The authors describe QSB as a temporary, stop-gap measure. It doesn’t scale to all users, is nonstandard relative to common transaction types, and doesn’t cover second-layer use cases such as the Lightning Network. - Long-term answer still unclear: The researchers themselves say protocol-level upgrades to quantum-safe signature schemes remain the better long-term solution. Where this fits in the larger debate The Bitcoin community is already split on quantum risk: some prioritize preserving Bitcoin unchanged, others advocate stronger moves (including freezing or burning vulnerable coins), and a third camp pushes for protocol upgrades to post‑quantum signatures. Levy’s proposal sits between those positions — it offers an opt-in, last-resort tool that skips network-wide consensus while the community considers more fundamental fixes. Timing and related work QSB arrives as quantum risk discussion is heating up. Google published research in March that renewed urgency around the topic, and Lightning Labs’ CTO Olaoluwa Osuntokun recently published a quantum fallback prototype. Together, these developments have intensified debate about how — and how fast — Bitcoin should prepare for a possible quantum future. Bottom line QSB is a clever, pragmatic proposal that shows one way to make new Bitcoin transactions harder for future quantum machines to steal — without changing the protocol. But it’s expensive, limited in who and what it protects, and not a substitute for the broader, protocol-level upgrades many experts say are ultimately necessary. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Arizona From Charging Kalshi in CFTC Prediction-Market Clash
Federal judge temporarily blocks Arizona from prosecuting Kalshi in showdown over prediction markets A federal judge in Arizona has temporarily barred the state from bringing criminal charges against prediction-market operator Kalshi, halting an arraignment that was set for Monday, April 13. The order responds to an emergency motion from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and represents the latest development in a multi-court fight over whether event contracts — often described as prediction markets — fall under federal oversight or state gambling laws. What happened - District Judge Michael Liburdi (D. Ariz.) issued a temporary restraining order Friday preventing Arizona from holding the scheduled arraignment or otherwise enforcing state gambling laws “in any criminal or civil enforcement actions to any contracts listed on CFTC-regulated [designated contract markets],” according to Paradigm senior regulatory counsel Stefan Schropp. - Arizona had announced plans to file 20 criminal charges against Kalshi, alleging the company offered unlawful betting products under state law. Why the CFTC intervened - The CFTC filed suit against Arizona and two other states, arguing that prediction markets (also called event contracts) are swaps subject to federal regulation and therefore preempt state enforcement. - In a statement, CFTC Chair Michael Selig praised the judge’s order and warned that “Arizona’s decision to weaponize state criminal law against companies that comply with federal law sets a dangerous precedent,” saying the decision sends a message that “intimidation is not an acceptable tactic to circumvent federal law.” A fragmented judicial landscape - Courts have split on this question. State tribunals have sometimes favored states — for example, a Nevada state court allowed the state Gaming Control Board to temporarily block Kalshi — while federal courts have produced different outcomes. - The Third Circuit recently ruled that prediction markets are subject to CFTC oversight and that the agency has discretion to allow or restrict certain products (including sports-related offerings). - The Ninth Circuit has declined to intervene in the Nevada matter but will hear a consolidated case next week that brings various providers and stakeholders to argue their positions. Where this leaves Kalshi - Judge Liburdi’s order came two days after he denied Kalshi’s separate motion for a preliminary injunction against Arizona; the two filings had been argued on different legal grounds. The temporary restraining order, however, prevents Arizona from moving forward with criminal enforcement for now. Why it matters for crypto and markets - The dispute highlights a broader regulatory tension affecting prediction markets and related crypto-native products: whether activities that look like betting should be governed by state gambling laws or by federal derivatives/swap rules administered by the CFTC. - The outcome of the consolidated appeals and further federal rulings could set important precedents for market operators, decentralized platforms, and any crypto firms offering event-based contracts. UPDATE (April 11, 2026, 01:16 UTC): Adds context. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Ripple Launches Native Digital-Asset Treasury System, Eyes Institutional Boost for XRP
Headline: Ripple rolls out first native digital-asset Treasury Management System as policy and industry voices reshape XRP’s outlook Ripple has taken a major step toward embedding itself in institutional finance: this April the company launched what it calls the first Treasury Management System (TMS) with native digital-asset capabilities. The product is part of a rebranded Ripple Treasury built on the company’s acquisition of GTreasury, and it introduces Digital Asset Accounts and a Unified Treasury that bring fiat and crypto liquidity into a single platform. What the new TMS does - CFOs and treasury teams can now view, hold, receive and manage fiat and digital assets across banks and custody providers from one interface. - Ripple says this eliminates the need to hop between platforms, manually reconcile records, or stitch data together. - According to Ripple, no other treasury system currently offers this level of native digital-asset and multi-provider consolidation—potentially giving Ripple Treasury an edge with enterprise clients. Why it matters for Ripple and XRP A treasury tool that simplifies institutional handling of both fiat and digital liquidity strengthens Ripple’s positioning in real-world financial infrastructure. Broader enterprise adoption of Ripple Treasury could increase confidence in Ripple’s technology and create stronger institutional relationships. Even if XRP isn’t used directly in every function of the new system, greater demand for Ripple’s products and services could indirectly support XRP’s use in payments and improve market sentiment—factors that may exert upward pressure on price over time. Industry chatter and community reaction The news comes as high-profile industry commentary adds fuel to debate over market leadership. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson stirred controversy with comments about Bitcoin and XRP’s 2018 legal challenges with the SEC. In a post amplified by market analyst Xaif Crypto, Hoskinson suggested that Bitcoin’s dominance could be vulnerable if another asset surpasses it in market cap, and argued that projects like Ethereum and XRP offer stronger technical capabilities and utility. He also claimed that XRP faced targeted legal attacks after briefly overtaking Ethereum in 2018—remarks that have found a receptive audience among many XRP supporters. Regulatory tailwinds: progress on the CLARITY Act Policy developments may be reinforcing a more favorable backdrop. On April 8, the White House published a report that downplayed banks’ concerns about stablecoin yields—an issue that had slowed movement on the CLARITY Act. The analysis concluded that banning stablecoin yields would only marginally increase bank lending (an estimated 0.02%, roughly $2.1 billion), implying that fears about a material negative impact on banks may be overstated. That shift in tone toward stablecoins could ease regulatory friction for stablecoin products—including Ripple’s RLUSD—and help support the broader crypto market. Bottom line Ripple’s new Treasury Management System is a strategic product play that deepens its enterprise offering and could boost institutional interest in Ripple’s ecosystem. Combined with vocal industry debate and potentially friendlier regulatory signals on stablecoins, these developments create a more constructive narrative around Ripple and XRP—though any direct price impact will depend on adoption, product integration, and how regulatory frameworks ultimately land. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Institutions Hoard 6.5M ETH, Staking Hits Record — Liquidity Squeeze Lifts Ethereum Above $2K
Ethereum has bounced back above $2,000 after briefly dipping below the mark, as bullish momentum slowly returns amid a volatile market. Price action may be choppy and largely sideways, but one trend that’s become impossible to ignore is persistent institutional demand for ETH. Institutional accumulation continues despite bearish conditions Public companies and institutional players have been steadily buying Ethereum through the downturn rather than pausing or selling. Research head Leon Waidmann of Lisk reported on X that public companies have purchased roughly 7.4 million ETH over the past 12 months — about 6.1% of the circulating supply. That buying spree has noticeably tightened the pool of sellable ETH on the market. Corporate treasuries have also ramped up holdings in a short period. According to the data Waidmann shared, cumulative ETH in corporate treasuries rose from near zero in May 2025 to more than 6.5 million ETH by April 2026. Those coins are generally moved into treasury reserves rather than exchanges, meaning they’re effectively illiquid unless corporate governance, disclosure and regulatory steps authorize a sale. Why this matters When large swaths of ETH are parked in corporate treasuries or otherwise removed from exchanges, available supply for trading contracts can shrink — a dynamic that supports the narrative of ETH as a strategic asset for long-term corporate holdings. Monthly additions to corporate treasuries suggest confidence in Ethereum’s role within the evolving digital economy, even as prices plateau. Staking hits new highs, further reducing liquidity Institutional buying isn’t the only factor taking ETH off the market. Staking activity has surged: the amount of ETH locked in staking contracts recently hit an all-time high. In May 2021 there were about 18 million ETH staked (roughly 16% of supply); by March 2026 that figure had climbed to around 40 million ETH, roughly 32% of total supply. Waidmann emphasized that this roughly one-third share of ETH is not sitting on exchanges or in sell-ready wallets — it’s securing the proof-of-stake network. Bottom line Even as prices trade sideways, two structural trends are clear: steady institutional accumulation into corporate treasuries and rising staking participation. Both trends remove ETH from liquid markets and reinforce the narrative of Ethereum as a long-term strategic asset for institutions and a cornerstone of the network’s security. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Operation Atlantic: International taskforce freezes $12M, thwarts approval‑phishing in real time
Operation Atlantic: law enforcement and crypto firms move in near‑real time to stop approval‑phishing scams A new international effort codenamed “Operation Atlantic” has produced striking early results in the fight against crypto fraud — and it’s notable because authorities are acting in near real time to freeze funds before they vanish on‑chain. Led by the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) and the U.S. Secret Service, Operation Atlantic is a coordinated UK–US–Canada venture that brings together public authorities with private industry partners, including blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis. According to Chainalysis, the operation’s goal is to spot victims and compromised wallets as they appear, secure illicit funds before they can be laundered through exchanges or services, produce investigative leads on the fraud networks, and build intelligence for ongoing probes. Early outcomes - More than 20,000 victims have been identified and over 20,000 wallet addresses flagged, the NCA reports. - Authorities say they’ve frozen more than $12 million in suspected scam proceeds so far. - In total, investigators have identified more than $45 million in stolen cryptocurrency linked to these schemes worldwide. - The NCA singled out one U.K. victim who lost more than £52,000. What the scams look like Operation Atlantic is targeting crypto investment scams and so‑called “approval‑phishing” attacks — in which victims are duped into signing malicious on‑chain approvals that give scammers permission to move tokens directly out of wallets. These fake prompts are often disguised as investment opportunities, TOS updates, or “account security” requests. Because they rely on a user signing a transaction rather than stealing a password, approval‑phishing has become a favorite tactic of organized fraud rings and can be hard for inexperienced users to spot. Recent incidents and industry responses - Earlier this month the Solana memecoin platform Bonk.fun was compromised after a phishing page presented a fake “Terms of Service” signature request; anyone who signed the prompt unknowingly allowed their funds to be drained. - In South Korea, authorities are rolling out a standardized withdrawal‑delay for all exchanges to blunt phishing attacks that exploit speed. - Social network X has announced a major anti‑crypto‑scam push aimed especially at phishing vectors. What’s next Operation Atlantic demonstrates law enforcement’s growing ability to trace and freeze stolen crypto in near real time. That capability both disrupts current scams and changes criminal incentives — expect fraud networks to develop more complex laundering routes to evade detection. For traders, investigators and analysts, that shift will likely mean new on‑chain signals to monitor as scammers adapt. Cover image from Perplexity. BTCUSDT chart from TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news