Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.51T
Market Cap
$2.51T
24h Trading Volume
$95.18B
BTC Dominance
57.11%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Rare On-Chain Setup Emerges as Bitcoin Holds $71K — Is a Durable Bottom Forming?
Headline: On-chain signals flash rare setup as Bitcoin holds above $71K — is a durable bottom forming? Bitcoin is trading just above $71,000 amid ongoing volatility, but a new CryptoQuant report is flagging a rarely-seen on-chain configuration that has historically preceded major accumulation windows. Two converging on-chain metrics are at the heart of the call. First is the Short-Term Sharpe Ratio, which has plunged into deep negative territory and is now touching the -40 threshold. That reading isn’t arbitrary: the -40 level appeared before every major accumulation phase over the last decade — 2015, 2019, 2020 and 2023 — and each instance led to a substantial re-rating of the asset. The current occurrence marks the fifth time Bitcoin has entered that zone. Put simply, the Sharpe Ratio measures risk-adjusted returns. A value near -40 implies investors are accepting extreme risk for sharply negative short-term returns — a condition that, historically, tends to exhaust sellers and set the stage for structural resets that precede large rallies. The report’s second indicator turns this single data point into a framework: the Buy/Sell Pressure Delta, which maps the market’s real-time transition from forced selling to genuine demand. Durable bottoms, CryptoQuant argues, are processes rather than one-off events, and they follow a consistent sequence: - Capitulation: large orange/red spikes below -0.05 on the delta mark forced selling and panic selling. That flush has already occurred. - Normalization: selling pressure thins and the delta creeps back toward neutral. This move is currently in progress. - Reclaim: the delta moves into blue “Buy Pressure” territory, confirming demand has returned. That reclaim is the asymmetric signal historically associated with the best risk-reward entries — and it has not yet appeared this cycle. Importantly, the report emphasizes that the most asymmetric capital deployments historically happened in the window between confirmed capitulation and the blue reclaim — in other words, during the waiting period rather than after the buy-pressure confirmation. Risks remain. Macro headwinds, liquidity constraints and fragile sentiment could prolong the transition from normalization to genuine demand. Still, the on-chain picture suggests the market may be closer to the beginning of an opportunity than the end of one — a distinction that matters most to cycle-aware investors. Price and technical context: Bitcoin stabilized above $70,000 following February’s sharp breakdown. The short-term structure has shifted from a downtrend to a range, with consolidation roughly between $66,000 and $72,000 and $70,000 acting as a pivot. However, the broader trend is unresolved: BTC trades below its 50-day (blue), 100-day (green) and 200-day (red) moving averages — all sloping downward — indicating bearish momentum has not been fully reversed. Recent upside attempts stalled near the 50-day, highlighting persistent overhead supply. Volume dynamics add clarity: the February sell-off featured a volume spike consistent with forced liquidations and local bottoms. Since then, volume has normalized, pointing to reduced market stress but not yet decisive accumulation. Structurally, this looks like a compression phase after deleveraging. A clean break above the $72,000–$75,000 zone would be required to shift momentum and confirm a broader recovery. Until then, Bitcoin is likely to remain range-bound, with price action dictated more by positioning than by a sustained rebound in demand. Featured image: ChatGPT. Chart: TradingView.com. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Crypto Patel: Bitcoin ATH Break Could Trigger $250K–$300K BTC, $8–10T Market and Altcoin Surge
After months of a drawn-out correction that has drained momentum from most altcoins, one crypto analyst is betting the lull is temporary — and that a dramatic wealth-creation window is imminent. On X, analyst Crypto Patel argued that a break above Bitcoin’s all-time high will trigger a sequence that could send BTC toward $250,000–$300,000 and flood billions into mid- and low-cap altcoins. Patel says the next six to ten months could become “one of the most significant wealth-creation windows in crypto history” if Bitcoin reclaims its prior peak — and, crucially, that much of the rest will follow automatically. Key points from the thesis - Current context: the total crypto market cap sits near $2.5 trillion after months of correction across coins. - Market-cap projection: once momentum returns, Patel expects a three- to four-fold expansion to roughly $8–$10 trillion. - Historical template: the analysis compares the present structure to Bitcoin’s 2012 cycle. According to the accompanying chart, both cycles show a sharp rally into an early peak (Patel points to October 2025 for the current cycle), a corrective phase with a January rebound that looks like a bear trap, then a deeper reset that formed the true bottom in 2012. - What happened in 2012: after reclaiming its previous high, Bitcoin launched an exponential rally — reportedly over 12,000% — that defined the ensuing bull run. - What could follow this time: if a similar pattern unfolds in the modern market, Patel projects Bitcoin could ultimately reach well over $250,000 and perhaps as high as $300,000. - Altcoin sequence: the forecast outlines a familiar progression — Bitcoin breaks ATH, Ethereum follows to new highs, and capital rotates into mid- and low-cap altcoins, with memecoins igniting in the final phase. That mirrors how altseasons played out in 2017 and 2021. - On metrics: Patel flagged the OTHERS/BTC ratio returning to a support level that historically preceded major alt rallies. He notes comparable rebounds produced gains of 423% in 2017 and 503% in 2021, and projects a potential 702% upside for the 2026 cycle. What to keep in mind This is a bullish, scenario-based forecast from a single analyst interpreting chart similarities and rotation dynamics. While the historical analogies and on-chain ratios are compelling to some traders, they are not guarantees. Crypto markets remain highly volatile and sensitive to macro, regulatory, and liquidity factors. Bottom line: If Bitcoin can decisively break its all-time high, this view says it could set off a multi-trillion-dollar market expansion and a broad altcoin rally — but investors should weigh the bullish thesis against the inherent risks and uncertainty of trying to time cyclical breakouts. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bithumb Seeks Court Freeze on 7 BTC After $40B 'Fat-Finger' Payout
Bithumb has turned to the courts to recover the last of the Bitcoin that slipped out of its vaults after a February “fat-finger” payout error, filing for a provisional seizure to freeze roughly 7 BTC (nearly $500,000) that has not been returned, local outlet Chosun Biz reports. What happened - On Feb. 6 the South Korean exchange accidentally sent 620,000 BTC — a sum valued at more than $40 billion at the time — to 249 users taking part in a “random box” promotion. Bithumb says the mistake was the result of a fat-finger error. - The exchange rapidly canceled the erroneous transfers and successfully reclaimed the vast majority of the coins. However, some recipients immediately sold or swapped the BTC for cash or other tokens, leaving a small amount unrecovered. - This week Bithumb filed for a provisional seizure (a temporary freeze of assets) to lock down 7 BTC pending further legal action to reclaim the funds. Legal outlook - Legal experts and regulators expect customers who kept or cashed out mistakenly sent BTC will struggle to defend their positions in court. Lee Chan-jin, head of the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) and a former lawyer, told reporters those who received the funds are “clearly subject to the return of unjust enrichment,” and converting the coins into cash could expose recipients to lawsuits. - Under South Korean law, assets received by mistake are generally deemed unjust enrichment and must be returned. Courts may also consider price movement between receipt and return: recipients could benefit if BTC falls before a return ruling, or face losses if prices climb. Regulatory and industry fallout - The error shone a harsh light on Bithumb’s internal controls. Reporting by Bitcoinist noted that at the time of the incident Bithumb had just 175 BTC on its books and under 50,000 BTC between its own and customer-held reserves — a shortfall that helped the erroneous payouts distort market prices. - Regulators responded quickly. The FSS, the Korean Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) formed an emergency task force to review exchange reserve reporting, operational practices and internal controls across domestic platforms. - In March KoFIU preliminarily notified Bithumb of a proposed six-month partial business suspension for alleged AML and KYC violations. - This week the Financial Services Commission (FSC) concluded that exchanges’ current trade-halting “kill switches” are unreliable in the event of large asset mismatches. The FSC has ordered all domestic crypto exchanges to move from 24-hour reconciliation cycles to a five‑minute asset‑matching regime by the end of May, and to disclose daily asset-matching balances. Why it matters Beyond the headline numbers, the incident exposed operational fragility at a major exchange, raised legal questions about who bears responsibility for mistaken transfers, and accelerated regulatory demands for more frequent, transparent reserve reconciliation across South Korea’s crypto industry. Bithumb’s court action to freeze remaining BTC is the next step in what will likely be a prolonged legal and regulatory cleanup. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Adam Back Rejects NYT Claim — 'We Are All Satoshi' Was a Film Reference, Not a Confession
Headline: Adam Back Says “We Are All Satoshi” Tweet Was a Film Reference — Not an Admission A terse three-word tweet from 2023 — “We Are All Satoshi” — briefly became one of the most dissected posts in Bitcoin history after a New York Times investigation singled out cryptographer Adam Back as a leading candidate for Bitcoin’s anonymous creator. Back now says the tweet had nothing to do with confessing authorship: it was a reference to a short film, not a hidden admission. What the NYT reported - On April 8, 2026 the New York Times published a year-long probe, led by journalist John Carreyrou, that analyzed more than 134,000 posts from 620 candidates on cryptography mailing lists going back to 1992. The story identified Back, a 55-year-old computer scientist living in El Salvador, as the closest linguistic match to Satoshi Nakamoto. - The NYT’s analysis focused heavily on stylistic fingerprints. Investigators catalogued 325 hyphenation quirks in Satoshi’s writing; Back matched 67 of them, while the second-closest candidate matched 38. They also pointed to shared habits such as British spellings, consistent hyphenation, alternating use of “e-mail” and “email,” and double spacing between sentences. - Timing was another element cited: Back was a visible participant in digital-cash forums for years, but his postings dropped off around the time Satoshi introduced Bitcoin in late 2008 — a cadence the investigators flagged as notable. Back’s rebuttal and context - Back pushed back on the NYT interpretation. He confirmed his long involvement in those forums but argued that a larger volume of posts naturally produces more stylistic overlap for analysts to find. In his view, many researchers were independently exploring similar ideas about digital cash, so overlapping technical language and concepts aren’t proof of a shared identity. - On the viral three-word tweet specifically, Back said it was inspired by the short film Block 170, The First Transaction, which features the phrase carved into stone. He denied any intent to imply he was Satoshi and said he does not know who created Bitcoin. - Beyond defending himself, Back made a broader point: the mystery around Satoshi may be beneficial. He argued that Bitcoin’s founderless status helps the network be perceived as a neutral, standalone monetary protocol rather than the project of a single individual — in other words, the anonymity is a feature, not a bug. Why this still matters - The NYT investigation renews public interest in Satoshi’s identity and highlights how computational linguistic methods are being used to probe authorship questions. But Back’s response underscores the limits of such analysis and the role of context, volume of writing, and convergent technical vocabulary. - Whether or not the debate settles the question of who Satoshi is, the controversy illustrates how quickly symbolic gestures — a three-word tweet, a change in posting cadence — can be amplified in crypto’s high-stakes narrative environment. Image credits: featured image from Blockstream, chart from TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Morgan Stanley's MSBT Debuts: First Bank-Linked Spot Bitcoin ETF Hits NYSE Arca
Morgan Stanley Investment Management has opened a direct line from Wall Street’s advisory network to Bitcoin. The firm launched a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund on NYSE Arca on Tuesday under the ticker MSBT, making the cryptocurrency available to clients through the same brokerage accounts used by Morgan Stanley’s roughly 16,000 financial advisors. The fund uses the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4 PM NY Settlement Rate to track Bitcoin’s daily price — a standardized price feed that aggregates executed trades from major spot exchanges. Why this matters - Morgan Stanley is the first major U.S. bank–affiliated asset manager to bring a publicly traded spot Bitcoin product to market, filling a gap left by earlier entrants such as BlackRock and Fidelity, which are unaffiliated with traditional U.S. banks. - Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas described the move as a dramatic industry shift; only a few years ago a bank-backed Bitcoin ETF would have been unthinkable. Fees and infrastructure - MSBT carries a 0.14% sponsor fee, slightly below Grayscale’s comparable product (about 0.15%), which Morgan Stanley says makes it the lowest-cost Bitcoin ETP among similar offerings. - Custody is split between BNY Mellon and Coinbase, with BNY also serving as administrator and transfer agent — signaling an effort to meet institutional controls and custody standards from day one. Market context and outlook - The launch comes amid a short-term headwind: Bitcoin ETFs experienced their first week of net outflows ahead of MSBT’s debut, with roughly $160 million withdrawn overall. Fidelity and Grayscale funds each saw nearly $48 million and $42 million in outflows, respectively. - MSBT joins Morgan Stanley’s ETF platform, launched in 2023, which now manages over $12 billion across 19 products. This is the firm’s first ETF offering that expands beyond traditional asset classes and puts the product squarely in the hands of hundreds of thousands of retail and high-net-worth clients through advisor recommendations. The big question going forward is whether Morgan Stanley’s massive advisor network will convert into meaningful retail inflows for MSBT — and whether the bank linkage will further normalize crypto exposure for mainstream investors. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin Stabilizing Amid Deleveraging — Mid‑Cycle Bottom, Not a Breakout
Bitcoin looks like it’s stabilizing — not sprinting away. Data from on‑chain analytics firm CryptoQuant and commentary from analyst MorenoDV_ suggest the market is in a broad “reset” phase: a multi-week deleveraging where leverage is being flushed out and acute stress is easing. That doesn’t mean a definitive bottom has been found; instead, indicators point to a transitionary middle stage of a bear-market bottoming process. What the charts are saying - Short-term Sharpe Ratio: MorenoDV_ points to the Short‑Term Sharpe Ratio plunging deep into negative territory (roughly −40). Historically, similar troughs in 2015, 2019, 2020 and 2023 marked major buying zones that preceded strong re‑pricings in BTC. The current reading sits in the same “red‑circled” area those prior cycle lows occupied. - 30‑day Buy/Sell Pressure Delta: This metric separates momentary reductions in selling from genuine return of buying demand. Bottoms tend to unfold in stages — an initial wave of forced selling (sharp negative spikes below −0.05), then a cooling period as selling pressure ebbs, and finally a shift into clear buy pressure (blue zone) when real demand returns. Right now the delta is recovering from the heavy‑selling phase but hasn’t yet reached the strong buy territory that historically signals the best entry windows. Why this matters Together, the alignment between the depressed Sharpe Ratio and the improving Buy/Sell Delta suggests one of the more attractive risk/reward setups of the cycle — but it’s not an all‑clear. CryptoQuant and the analyst characterize the current regime as a stress cycle: elevated unrealized losses, forced deleveraging, compressed futures basis, and defensive options positioning. Those dynamic forces can keep price action choppy even as headline stress fades. The caveats Macro conditions, liquidity dynamics, and lingering weak sentiment could prolong this consolidation or produce fresh volatility. As QCP Market Colour noted in a recent report, recent BTC behavior looks more like a pause than a decisive breakout. For investors who think in cycles, the data argue we’re closer to the start of a new opportunity than the end of the bear market — but patience and risk management remain essential. Cover image: Perplexity. BTCUSD chart: TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news