Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.51T
Market Cap
$2.51T
24h Trading Volume
$95.32B
BTC Dominance
57.10%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Morgan Stanley's MSBT Debuts: First Bank-Linked Spot Bitcoin ETF Hits NYSE Arca
Morgan Stanley Investment Management has opened a direct line from Wall Street’s advisory network to Bitcoin. The firm launched a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund on NYSE Arca on Tuesday under the ticker MSBT, making the cryptocurrency available to clients through the same brokerage accounts used by Morgan Stanley’s roughly 16,000 financial advisors. The fund uses the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4 PM NY Settlement Rate to track Bitcoin’s daily price — a standardized price feed that aggregates executed trades from major spot exchanges. Why this matters - Morgan Stanley is the first major U.S. bank–affiliated asset manager to bring a publicly traded spot Bitcoin product to market, filling a gap left by earlier entrants such as BlackRock and Fidelity, which are unaffiliated with traditional U.S. banks. - Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas described the move as a dramatic industry shift; only a few years ago a bank-backed Bitcoin ETF would have been unthinkable. Fees and infrastructure - MSBT carries a 0.14% sponsor fee, slightly below Grayscale’s comparable product (about 0.15%), which Morgan Stanley says makes it the lowest-cost Bitcoin ETP among similar offerings. - Custody is split between BNY Mellon and Coinbase, with BNY also serving as administrator and transfer agent — signaling an effort to meet institutional controls and custody standards from day one. Market context and outlook - The launch comes amid a short-term headwind: Bitcoin ETFs experienced their first week of net outflows ahead of MSBT’s debut, with roughly $160 million withdrawn overall. Fidelity and Grayscale funds each saw nearly $48 million and $42 million in outflows, respectively. - MSBT joins Morgan Stanley’s ETF platform, launched in 2023, which now manages over $12 billion across 19 products. This is the firm’s first ETF offering that expands beyond traditional asset classes and puts the product squarely in the hands of hundreds of thousands of retail and high-net-worth clients through advisor recommendations. The big question going forward is whether Morgan Stanley’s massive advisor network will convert into meaningful retail inflows for MSBT — and whether the bank linkage will further normalize crypto exposure for mainstream investors. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin Stabilizing Amid Deleveraging — Mid‑Cycle Bottom, Not a Breakout
Bitcoin looks like it’s stabilizing — not sprinting away. Data from on‑chain analytics firm CryptoQuant and commentary from analyst MorenoDV_ suggest the market is in a broad “reset” phase: a multi-week deleveraging where leverage is being flushed out and acute stress is easing. That doesn’t mean a definitive bottom has been found; instead, indicators point to a transitionary middle stage of a bear-market bottoming process. What the charts are saying - Short-term Sharpe Ratio: MorenoDV_ points to the Short‑Term Sharpe Ratio plunging deep into negative territory (roughly −40). Historically, similar troughs in 2015, 2019, 2020 and 2023 marked major buying zones that preceded strong re‑pricings in BTC. The current reading sits in the same “red‑circled” area those prior cycle lows occupied. - 30‑day Buy/Sell Pressure Delta: This metric separates momentary reductions in selling from genuine return of buying demand. Bottoms tend to unfold in stages — an initial wave of forced selling (sharp negative spikes below −0.05), then a cooling period as selling pressure ebbs, and finally a shift into clear buy pressure (blue zone) when real demand returns. Right now the delta is recovering from the heavy‑selling phase but hasn’t yet reached the strong buy territory that historically signals the best entry windows. Why this matters Together, the alignment between the depressed Sharpe Ratio and the improving Buy/Sell Delta suggests one of the more attractive risk/reward setups of the cycle — but it’s not an all‑clear. CryptoQuant and the analyst characterize the current regime as a stress cycle: elevated unrealized losses, forced deleveraging, compressed futures basis, and defensive options positioning. Those dynamic forces can keep price action choppy even as headline stress fades. The caveats Macro conditions, liquidity dynamics, and lingering weak sentiment could prolong this consolidation or produce fresh volatility. As QCP Market Colour noted in a recent report, recent BTC behavior looks more like a pause than a decisive breakout. For investors who think in cycles, the data argue we’re closer to the start of a new opportunity than the end of the bear market — but patience and risk management remain essential. Cover image: Perplexity. BTCUSD chart: TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Dogecoin Stuck in Ichimoku Cloud — Thin Kumo Could Trigger Rapid Breakout
Dogecoin has entered a phase of uncertainty after sliding into the Ichimoku Kumo on the 4-hour chart, putting directional momentum on hold as price chops between the cloud’s boundaries. Caught inside the cloud Trader Tardigrade notes that DOGE’s recent action has it “stuck” in the thick of the Ichimoku cloud — a textbook sign of indecision. After falling from the cloud’s upper limit, Dogecoin is now oscillating between the Kumo’s ceiling and floor, effectively trading sideways as buyers and sellers battle for control. Why the Kumo matters In Ichimoku terms, being inside the cloud signals a neutral market: neither bulls nor bears have clear dominance. The Kumo acts as both support and resistance at once — the lower edge is currently acting like a safety net while the upper edge forms a near-term cap. Because the cloud is relatively thin in this zone, any breakout above or below it is likely to be quick and decisive rather than gradual. What would confirm a new trend Tardigrade highlights two clean outcomes to watch for: - Bullish case: a decisive break and a daily close above the Kumo High would point to a trend reversal or a relief bounce that could challenge ongoing selling pressure. - Bearish case: a break and close below the Kumo Low would confirm the broader downtrend and could trigger fresh liquidations. Early warning signs: Kijun-sen and Tenkan-sen Traders looking to anticipate the next move should monitor the Kijun-sen (Base Line) and Tenkan-sen (Conversion Line). Crosses between these lines often give the earliest hint of a momentum shift and can warn of a breakout before price actually leaves the cloud. Bottom line For now, DOGE is range-bound inside the Ichimoku cloud on the 4-hour timeframe. A confirmed daily close outside the Kumo is needed to establish the next major leg — and because the cloud is thin, that leg could unfold quickly. Keep an eye on the Kijun/Tenkan interaction for early clues. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
CryptoQuant: February's $2.13B Deleveraging Purged Leverage, Propelling ETH Back Above $2,200
Ethereum has climbed back above $2,200 — and a new CryptoQuant report argues this is not just a short-lived bounce but the outcome of a meaningful structural cleanup that took place in February. What happened - In mid‑February 2026, Binance’s ETH Open Interest 30‑day Change plunged to roughly -$2.13 billion — the largest deleveraging since the similar -$2.11 billion flush in October 2025. - At the time the sell‑off looked like a danger signal: charts were falling and leverage was being violently removed. But history matters — the October deleveraging didn’t lead to further collapse; it marked a capitulation that cleared speculative excess and set the stage for stabilization and recovery. - February repeated the same pattern. Despite the $2.13B drop in open interest, ETH did not crash further; it held near $1,800 and has since rallied above $2,200. Why this matters - The key insight from CryptoQuant: when open interest drops sharply without a proportional price decline, it usually indicates forced liquidation of speculative positions rather than a loss of genuine demand. - That forced deleveraging removed positions that would have amplified future downside. With less liquidation overhang, the market’s path to stabilization shortened and the recovery that followed has a cleaner, more durable structural base. - In short: Ethereum’s recent gains are not just a price rebound — they’re the market rebuilding after a major flush of leverage. Technical context and risks - The recovery is constructive but not yet a confirmed trend reversal. ETH remains below its key moving averages (50-, 100-, and 200‑day), all sloping down — a sign of sustained bearish pressure across timeframes. - The bounce toward $2,200 has failed to decisively reclaim the 50‑day average, suggesting momentum is still fragile. - Volume patterns add nuance: the February spike looks like forced liquidations (exhaustion), while the subsequent decline in volume during consolidation signals reduced participation rather than renewed buying strength. - For a confirmed shift from recovery to a new uptrend, ETH needs to reclaim the $2,400–$2,600 area (around the 100‑day average). Until then, expect rangebound action with $2,000–$1,800 as the critical support band. Implications for traders and investors - Short term: less liquidation risk makes overly aggressive leveraged short positions less likely to cascade prices lower, but momentum remains weak. - Medium term: a sustained move above the 100‑day and then 200‑day averages would validate the structural cleanup and open the door for a more durable rally. - Risk management remains essential: while the market has absorbed a major deleveraging, participation is still low and trend confirmation is pending. Bottom line February’s massive open‑interest drop on Binance looks, in hindsight, like a necessary purge of speculative leverage rather than a terminal sell signal. That cleanup reduced systemic liquidation pressure and helped pave the way for Ethereum’s climb back above $2,200 — but traders should wait for moving‑average confirmations before declaring a full trend reversal. Chart: TradingView.com. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
FedNow's Intermediary Shift Could Boost XRP's Role in Cross‑Border Payments
A Quiet Fed Change Could Boost XRP’s Role in Cross-Border Payments A technical but important tweak to U.S. payments infrastructure is rekindling interest in XRP’s potential as a bridge asset for cross-border transfers. The Federal Reserve’s recent proposal to expand FedNow’s capabilities — specifically by allowing banks and credit unions to route transfers through intermediaries — has prompted fresh discussion in crypto and payments circles about how digital assets might plug into the traditional rails. What’s changing with FedNow Under current rules, FedNow primarily supports direct transfers between two U.S. banks. The Fed’s proposal would permit use of third-party intermediaries to facilitate transfers, including the international legs of payments. That change could make it easier for nonbank payment providers and digital-asset infrastructure to interoperate with FedNow without requiring a full banking sponsor relationship for every counterparty. Why Ripple is being mentioned Analyst XFinanceBull (on X) has pointed out two developments that make Ripple an obvious candidate to benefit from this shift: - Ripple National Trust Bank has been conditionally approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). That conditional charter, if finalized, would enable the institution to custody digital assets, provide lending services, and seek direct access to Federal Reserve services — including instant-pay systems such as FedNow. - Ripple is reportedly awaiting approval of a Fed Master Account application. A master account is the mechanism that connects a chartered bank directly to Federal Reserve payment systems; obtaining it would be the final operational step for direct Fed access. Academic and industry context A peer-reviewed paper published by the Financial Planning Association examined Ripple and XRP’s evolving role in cross-border settlement, noting potential integration points such as FedNow access and participation in the Fed’s discount window for liquidity support. Those findings align with the Fed’s intermediary-friendly direction: if FedNow supports cross-border flows through intermediaries, a conditionally chartered Ripple bank could conceivably act as one of those bridges. Broader signals and adoption Supporters also point to Ripple’s engagements with global institutions such as the IMF and Bank for International Settlements as evidence of its interoperability ambitions. Separately, industry reports say more than 300 financial institutions have explored, adopted, or tested XRP in some capacity — a figure often cited in discussions about enterprise interest in the token as a liquidity tool. Partnerships with firms like Temenos are also highlighted as steps toward real-world banking integrations. How XRP would be used Proponents describe XRP as a fast, low-cost bridge currency for converting between local currencies and major settlement currencies like USD. Commentators (including community figures such as “Ledger Man”) argue the token can speed up conversions for currencies with thin FX liquidity — examples often cited include the Iraqi dinar, Vietnamese dong, and Venezuelan bolívar. If intermediaries are permitted on FedNow and Ripple secures full operational approval, those conversion pathways could become easier to stitch into existing banking flows. A cautionary note None of this is a guaranteed outcome. Conditional OCC approval and a master account application are significant milestones, but final regulatory approvals and operational integrations remain to be completed. The Fed’s proposal itself still needs to move through policy and rulemaking processes. What’s clear, however, is that the architecture of U.S. instant payments is evolving in ways that could create new entry points for digital-asset firms — and Ripple appears well positioned to try to take advantage if regulators and the Fed give the green light. Bottom line The Fed’s intermediary-friendly move for FedNow has opened a possible path for digital-asset infrastructure to interface with U.S. instant payments. With a conditional national charter in hand and a pending Fed master account, Ripple — and XRP as a bridge asset — is getting attention as a potential on-ramp. Whether it becomes an operational reality will depend on final approvals and the Fed’s rulemaking outcome. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
OpenAI Pauses UK Stargate Rollout Over Energy Costs, Echoes Crypto's Power Problem
OpenAI has paused its planned Stargate AI infrastructure rollout in the U.K., citing high energy costs and regulatory uncertainty, the company confirmed to CNBC. The move puts on hold a major partnership with Nvidia and infrastructure provider Nscale that had been announced in mid‑September 2025. The Stargate plan envisioned deploying up to 8,000 GPUs starting in Q1 2026, with the option to scale to roughly 31,000 GPUs over time. At the announcement, CEO Sam Altman framed the effort as foundational: “Everything starts with compute... Compute infrastructure will be the basis for the economy of the future,” he said, promising that the work with Nvidia would enable new AI breakthroughs at scale. Planned sites included locations such as Cobalt Park in northeast England—part of a designated “AI Growth Zone”—and the build was intended to supply local compute capacity for AI systems. But the economics of running AI-scale data centers in the U.K. quickly emerged as a hurdle. Industrial electricity for medium-sized U.K. businesses averages about 24 pence per kilowatt-hour, and large AI data centers often run continuously at 50–100 megawatts. More than 140 projects are already queued for grid connections totaling over 50 gigawatts, creating both a capacity and cost squeeze. At today’s prices, operating a 100‑MW data center in the U.K. could cost on the order of $125 million to $250 million a year—numbers that underscore why OpenAI paused the project while it weighs long‑term viability. Stargate U.K. followed OpenAI’s July 2025 memorandum of understanding with the U.K. government on adopting frontier AI systems in public services. It also comes after a separate U.S. Stargate infrastructure initiative announced by the Trump administration in January 2025. OpenAI told CNBC it continues to evaluate the U.K. project and “will move forward when the right conditions such as regulation and the cost of energy enable long-term infrastructure investment.” Why crypto readers should care: the pause highlights an emerging reality for compute‑intensive industries including AI and crypto—energy prices, grid capacity and regulatory clarity are decisive factors in where large infrastructure gets built. The same cost and connection bottlenecks that have shaped crypto mining geography now play a central role in AI deployment decisions, and competition for affordable, reliable power is likely to intensify as both sectors scale. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Decrypt. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news