Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps

The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.39T

Market Cap

$2.39T

24h Trading Volume

$45.19B

BTC Dominance

56.20%

#
Name
Price
1h %
24h %
7d %
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Chart (7d)

No cryptocurrencies found

Try adjusting your search query

Showing 100 of 13217 cryptocurrencies

Latest Crypto News

View All News
Former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng Reemerges as Bitcoin Advocate, Joins Stack BTC

Former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng Reemerges as Bitcoin Advocate, Joins Stack BTC

Kwasi Kwarteng, the UK’s short‑lived Chancellor who lasted only weeks in September 2022, is resurfacing as a prominent voice for bitcoin and long-term monetary thinking. In a wide‑ranging CoinDesk interview he revisited the infamous “mini‑budget,” conceding it was rushed: “The mini budget was literally two weeks after we took office, it was just very, very rushed business.” His tenure began on Sept. 6 and was immediately disrupted by the death of Queen Elizabeth II two days later, a compressed timetable that he says left little chance for proper coordination or scrutiny. The policy fallout was dramatic—gilt yields spiked and helped lay bare the UK’s Liability‑Driven Investment pension crisis. Despite the political cost, Kwarteng defended the mini‑budget’s intent and used the episode to argue for deeper reform of Britain’s fiscal framework. He warned the country is trapped in a fiscal “doom loop” where “you’re spending more money than you can raise in taxation,” and cautioned that higher taxes can “kill incentives in the economy.” He also lambasted short‑termism in both politics and markets: “Everything’s quarterly driven, people are either euphoric or freaking out. And actually, you’ve got to take a longer view.” That longer perspective has shifted his focus toward bitcoin and monetary history. While in office, Kwarteng said the Treasury and the Bank of England were aware of bitcoin and digital assets but that adoption in the UK remained “incredibly small.” He suggested Britain has been slower to embrace crypto innovation than some European peers, noting Paris is becoming “quite forward leaning on digital assets.” He also pushed back on critics such as former prime minister Boris Johnson, who had called bitcoin a “Ponzi,” urging a more open‑minded approach to emerging forms of money. Kwarteng is now putting his views into practice as executive chairman of UK bitcoin treasury firm Stack BTC (STAK). The company holds 31 BTC on its balance sheet and has attracted notable political interest—Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has taken a roughly 6% stake in the business. For Kwarteng, the move symbolizes a break from reactive policymaking and a bet on what he believes could be a more resilient, long‑term monetary future anchored by new forms of money such as bitcoin. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Buy-and-Hold Bitcoin Treasuries Are Dead — Firms Shift to Staking, Trading, Credit

Buy-and-Hold Bitcoin Treasuries Are Dead — Firms Shift to Staking, Trading, Credit

“The era of buying bitcoin and calling it a treasury strategy is over.” That blunt assessment now has hard numbers to back it up. By early 2026, more than 200 publicly listed companies held digital assets on their balance sheets, managing over $115 billion in aggregate (DLA Piper, Oct 2025). The combined market cap of those firms hit roughly $150 billion by September 2025—a nearly fourfold jump year-over-year—but many still trade below the value of their own crypto holdings. The message from markets is clear: accumulation alone won’t cut it. Investors now expect capital discipline and demonstrable economic return. Management teams have reacted with buyback programs and new transparency metrics—like “BTC per share”—to show how treasury holdings add value beyond token price moves (AMINA Bank Research, 2026). The sector is undergoing a transition from passive hoarding (“DAT 1.0”) to active yield generation (“DAT 2.0”). Three distinct treasury models are emerging, each with different risk/return trade-offs and governance demands. 1) Protocol-native yield - What it is: Using tokens to support network functions—staking, validating, or participating in native infrastructure such as Lightning routing—to earn protocol-level rewards and fees. - Why it matters: Institutional-grade infrastructure can boost returns and reduce slippage or downtime risk. - Example: Bitmine Immersion Technologies reported over 3 million staked ETH by early 2026, total holdings of $9.9 billion and annualized staking revenue of about $172 million; its validator network slightly outperformed the Composite Ethereum Staking Rate (SEC filing, Mar 2026). - Advanced variant: Restaking—where staked ETH is used to secure additional services—has been pursued by firms like SharpLink Gaming, which deployed $200 million via EigenCloud to capture higher yields across applications from AI to identity (SEC filing, 2025). - Key risks: technical security, smart-contract exposure and governance of staking/validator operations. 2) Market-driven income (active trading) - What it is: Using trading strategies—funding-rate arbitrage, basis trades, options-writing—to generate cash income, often market-neutral in intent. - Why it matters: These strategies can turn a treasury into a revenue-generating desk, but they require specialized trading expertise and tight risk controls. - Example: A major Japanese listed firm holding ~35,000 BTC generated the equivalent of ~$55 million in bitcoin income via option strategies and posted operating profit growth >1,600% YoY—yet ended up with a large net loss owing to mark-to-market accounting effects under local rules (TradingView; Kavout, 2026). That gap highlights how reported earnings can diverge from cash profitability. - Key risks: staffing, around-the-clock monitoring, model and correlation risk, and accounting complexities. 3) Productive balance-sheet capital (credit deployment) - What it is: Borrowing against crypto collateral on a non-recourse basis to obtain stablecoin liquidity, then deploying that liquidity into short-duration private credit and other yield-bearing real-economy lending. - Why it matters: Preserves upside exposure to the underlying crypto while producing recurring interest income—if executed on sound underwriting and liquidity-management frameworks. - Operational needs: banking-style infrastructure, credit underwriting expertise, governance and third-party due diligence. - Why stablecoins matter: As institutional rails, stablecoins are enabling faster settlement and cross-border flows. Projections have posited stablecoin market caps expanding to as much as $1.2 trillion by 2028 (Coinbase Institutional, Aug 2025), which would boost the viability of credit-deployment strategies. - Key risks: credit and counterparty risk, leverage management, and dependence on mature stablecoin infrastructure. Hybrid approaches are already proving resilient. Galaxy Digital combines its treasury with institutional services—collateralized lending, advisory, infrastructure—and in Q3 2025 posted record adjusted gross profit north of $730 million (Mint Ventures Research, 2025). It even repurposed its Helios mining campus into contracted AI compute capacity, underlining how diversified, uncorrelated income streams can strengthen a treasury. The takeaways - Price appreciation no longer qualifies as a treasury strategy. Markets now price in whether crypto holdings generate real, sustainable yield. - No single model is a silver bullet. The best outcomes will likely come from hybrid strategies calibrated to a firm’s governance, operational capability and risk appetite. - Governance, transparency and institutional-grade infrastructure are decisive. The winners won’t necessarily be the biggest holders but the most disciplined operators. Important notice (condensed) This piece was prepared by Greengage & Co. Limited for institutional and professional audiences and is for informational purposes only. It is not financial or investment advice. Digital assets carry significant volatility and regulatory risk; past performance is no guarantee of future results. Readers should seek independent professional advice before making investment decisions. Greengage is not FCA-authorized for investment business and does not provide custody, lending, or investment management services. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Crypto Thieves Follow the Money — $168M Stolen From 34 DeFi Protocols in Q1 2026

Crypto Thieves Follow the Money — $168M Stolen From 34 DeFi Protocols in Q1 2026

Crypto thieves don’t follow a calendar — they follow the money. That was the blunt takeaway from Kraken’s chief security officer, Nick Percoco, who told reporters that hacking activity in crypto spikes not because of seasons but because value concentrates: during bull runs, major product launches and periods of rapid growth. “Vulnerabilities can be exploited in any market environment,” Percoco warned, urging the industry to treat security as continuous work, not a seasonal task. New data backs up the point. DefiLlama reports that hackers siphoned $168 million from 34 DeFi protocols in Q1 2026 (January–March). That’s a sharp drop from the $1.58 billion recorded in the same quarter of 2025 — but that prior total was heavily distorted by one gigantic incident: the $1.4 billion Bybit breach, which accounted for nearly all of Q1 2025’s losses. Remove that outlier and the year-over-year shift looks less dramatic. Still, Q1 2026 wasn’t free of high-profile thefts. January was the hardest month: portfolio manager Step Finance lost $40 million after attackers compromised private keys, and days later (Jan. 8) decentralized protocol Truebit was drained of $26.4 million in ether via smart contract manipulation. In late March, stablecoin issuer Resolv Labs was hit in another private key compromise — the same operational failure that felled Step Finance. Those two failure modes — private key compromises and code exploits — keep recurring. Private key failures are typically human or operational errors (lost or leaked credentials, exposed signing keys); smart contract exploits are coding or protocol-design vulnerabilities that attackers can manipulate. Both types remain unresolved risks across the ecosystem. Percoco painted a broad threat landscape: highly coordinated criminal groups, organized networks and opportunistic individuals scanning for weak spots in smart contracts and user-facing systems. State-linked actors have also been implicated in major heists; suspected North Korea-affiliated groups were tied to a private key leak that cost decentralized exchange Drift Protocol an estimated $285 million. The takeaway for builders and users: attackers move to where value accumulates, not according to a timetable. Security efforts must be perpetual and multi-layered if the industry hopes to reduce the recurring toll of losses. Featured image: Unsplash. Chart: TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Bitcoin $67K: On-Chain Shows Institutional Accumulation, Retail Capitulation — Watch Whale Inflows

Bitcoin $67K: On-Chain Shows Institutional Accumulation, Retail Capitulation — Watch Whale Inflows

Bitcoin is lingering in bear-market territory around $67,000 despite a brief weekly bounce, and on-chain signals show a market quietly reshaping beneath the surface. Market analyst GugaOnChain, in a QuickTake on April 3, points to a widening divergence between tightening on-chain supply and rising macro uncertainty — a mix that has left Bitcoin in a delicate position. On-chain flows tell the story of reduced sell-side liquidity. Over the past month roughly 66,300 BTC — about $4.44 billion at current levels — has been pulled off exchanges, a classic sign of coins moving into long-term storage. At the same time, OTC desks have dominated trading: 92.1% of recent BTC volume, or $16.49 billion, occurred off public order books, leaving just 7.9% on exchanges. Those are typically bullish hallmarks, suggesting quiet institutional accumulation and growing scarcity of instantly available BTC. Retail activity paints a different picture. GugaOnChain notes realized losses of about $690 million in a single 24-hour span, a pattern consistent with retail capitulation. Historically, such weak-hand selling can help form local bottoms by removing immediate selling pressure, especially when larger players are accumulating. But supply dynamics aren’t the whole story. Bitcoin remains vulnerable to macro shocks — global liquidity shifts, interest-rate moves and geopolitical flashpoints can still overpower on-chain bullishness. Recent geopolitical tensions involving the US, Iran and Israel underscore that risk. To track how big players react to these shocks, GugaOnChain highlights the Top-5 Exchange Whale Inflow metric: the seven-day average now sits at 16,551 BTC. A sharp uptick in inflows to major venues — Binance for global demand and Coinbase for U.S. flows — would signal a shift from accumulation toward liquidity-seeking and often precede sudden sell-offs or flash crashes. Snapshot of market stats: Bitcoin trades at $66,889 after a 1.36% gain over the past week, while daily trading volume has fallen 41.68% to $22.91 billion. With much retail selling seemingly exhausted, the risk-reward looks attractive for a possible local bottom — yet the market’s fragility is real. An elevated probability of a “left-fail” (a sudden break below recent support) means any sharp drop could have outsized effects. Bottom line: on-chain indicators point to institutional accumulation and constrained exchange supply, but macro and geopolitical volatility remain the wildcard. Traders should watch exchange whale inflows and exchange balances closely — they’ll likely give the earliest clues if accumulation turns into a rush for liquidity. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Doctor Profit: $200K Bitcoin Still Possible — Wait for $40K–$50K Entry

Doctor Profit: $200K Bitcoin Still Possible — Wait for $40K–$50K Entry

Headline: Analyst who called Bitcoin top says $200K rally is still possible — but advises waiting for a lower entry Doctor Profit — the crypto analyst known for correctly calling Bitcoin’s top — on X reiterated a bullish long-term target for BTC while warning traders not to buy at current levels. He says Bitcoin can still reach a new all-time high near $200,000, but expects the market to drop further first, creating a much better buying opportunity. Key points from Doctor Profit’s view - Long-term outlook: BTC could ultimately rally to roughly $200,000. - Near-term caution: now is “not a good time to buy,” because further weakness is likely. - Optimal entry range: he plans buy orders roughly between $40,000 and $50,000, and advised against placing buys above $60,000 — or near $70,000. - Rationale: buying today yields fewer coins than buying the expected lower prices; treating any purchase now as equivalent to buying later is, in his words, “absolutely dangerous thinking.” He also stressed focusing on maximizing profit rather than just dollar-cost averaging into a rising asset. - Market regime: he still views Bitcoin as in a bear market, though a short-lived relief rally above $80,000 remains possible. Technical confirmation still pending, per CrypFlow Crypto analyst CrypFlow pointed to a separate technical signal — the 2-month Stochastic RSI bullish cross — which has historically marked the best buy windows in past cycles (2015, 2019, 2023). That bullish cross has not yet formed this cycle. CrypFlow says momentum typically resets below 20, sentiment turns negative, and then the bullish cross confirms the shift; until that cross appears, it’s not yet time to aggressively buy. He plans to build exposure gradually and add on weakness, but treats the Stochastic RSI cross as the clearer confirmation. Market snapshot At the time of writing, Bitcoin trades around $66,800, up over the past 24 hours (CoinMarketCap). Bottom line Both analysts leave room for a larger upside later, but urge patience now: Doctor Profit is waiting for a lower price band to maximize coin accumulation, while CrypFlow is watching for a specific technical confirmation before increasing exposure. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Bitcoin ETFs Outpace Gold in March — $1.32B Inflows vs $2.92B Outflows

Bitcoin ETFs Outpace Gold in March — $1.32B Inflows vs $2.92B Outflows

Bitcoin ETFs quietly pulled in more than a billion in March while gold ETFs saw billions head for the exits — a divergence that could signal a broader shift in how investors allocate risk and store value. The picture in flows was stark: US spot Bitcoin ETFs logged $1.32 billion in net inflows last month, even as US-based gold ETFs recorded $2.92 billion in net outflows. Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart flagged the gap as more than a one-month blip on the Coin Stories podcast, saying it reflects Bitcoin’s growing appeal as a multi-purpose portfolio asset. “There are just more use cases of why somebody would put a Bitcoin ETF in a portfolio,” Seyffart said. His point: gold is largely stuck in one role — a hedge against inflation and currency debasement — whereas Bitcoin is being used in multiple ways. Some investors treat it as a store of value like gold; others view it as a growth asset, a play on liquidity conditions, or a form of digital property. “It can be hot sauce in a portfolio,” Seyffart added, meaning its volatility and upside can spice up returns for investors willing to accept the risk. Gold’s rough month was exacerbated by a single brutal day: on March 4 GLD, the largest US gold-backed ETF, suffered a $3 billion outflow — its steepest single-day withdrawal in over two years. Mid-March coverage citing Bank for International Settlements data also showed institutional selling of gold on Wall Street had accelerated over the prior four months, even as retail purchases of the metal ramped up to roughly three times the rate seen six months earlier. Seyffart goes further, suggesting that if Bitcoin’s multi-use narrative persists, Bitcoin ETFs could eventually overtake gold ETFs in total assets under management — a major reallocation of where “big money” parks value given gold’s current AUM lead. Price action, however, has not favored either asset recently. At the time of the original report, Bitcoin traded around $66,889, down about 7.35% over 30 days, while gold stood near $4,674, off roughly 8.20% over the same period. Chris Kuiper, observing the historical tug-of-war between the two, noted that leadership tends to rotate: with gold outperforming in 2025 it wouldn’t be surprising if Bitcoin regained the baton next. Whether that rotation happens remains uncertain, but March’s fund-flow data suggest some investors are already shifting allocations — and that Bitcoin’s narrative as a versatile, portfolio-level asset is gaining traction. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news