Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.40T
Market Cap
$2.40T
24h Trading Volume
$49.49B
BTC Dominance
56.20%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
24/7 Crypto-Style Trading Could Kill After‑Hours 'House Advantage' — Traders Win, Brokers Lose
Headline: 24/7 Stock Trading Could Break the After-Hours “House Advantage” — Traders Stand to Win, Brokers May Lose As U.S. exchanges race to offer round‑the‑clock markets, one clear winner could be retail and professional traders — while the middlemen who profit from market closures may be the biggest losers. What’s changing The NYSE has filed with the SEC for approval of 24/7 trading, Nasdaq announced similar plans in December, CME is targeting 24‑hour crypto futures in 2026 (pending approval), and Cboe has already expanded U.S. index options to 24/5. The industry shift would bring equities closer to crypto markets’ always‑on model and let traders react instantly to news instead of waiting for the next opening bell. Why traders could benefit Mati Greenspan, CEO and founder of Quantum Economics, told CoinDesk that continuous trading removes the weekend and after‑hours “vacuum” that has long advantaged brokers. “The biggest losers in 24/7 stock trading won’t be traders: they’ll benefit massively. It'll be the middlemen who’ve long made money when traders can’t trade,” he said. With markets open around the clock, firms and retail participants can respond in real time to geopolitical shocks, earnings, or macro surprises — the same edge crypto traders have enjoyed for years. The after‑hours problem: thin liquidity and wider spreads After the 4 p.m. ET close, liquidity thins and spreads widen, creating an environment where prices can be more easily moved. NYSE floor broker Joe Dente explained that with fewer participants and lower order book depth, “you’re going to see larger spreads” and exaggerated price moves compared with core hours. Academic work supports this: a joint UC Berkeley–University of Rochester study found after‑hours price discovery to be “much less efficient,” driven by lower volumes and thinner liquidity. Allegations of coordinated price-setting Greenspan and several market participants argue that when markets reopen after big events, a small set of firms can effectively determine the first tradable price — sometimes setting levels that trigger stop losses for clients. “They basically get to control prices, often with hours to strategize,” Greenspan said, bluntly characterizing some practices as “manipulation outright.” A broker familiar with overnight trading (who spoke anonymously) echoed that thin liquidity occasionally makes it easier for coordinated strategies to influence prices in less‑liquid stocks. Where evidence exists — and where it doesn’t Researchers have documented how pre‑open auctions and order‑cancellation strategies can distort opening prices. An SSRN study on opening‑price manipulation shows brokers can submit and cancel large orders to push prices temporarily away from fundamentals, producing inflated opens that later revert and leave buyers with losses. Regulators have also taken action: in late 2025 the SEC settled charges over a multi‑year spoofing scheme in thinly traded securities, and Velox Clearing paid $1.3 million for failing to detect layering and spoofing. FINRA’s 2026 oversight report cited firms for inadequate supervision of potentially manipulative after‑hours activity. Still, proving intent and coordination in many cases remains difficult — plausible deniability blurs the line between aggressive trading and outright manipulation. Speed, algorithms, and the human disadvantage Electronic markets favor speed. As Dente put it, “There’s always an edge for whoever has the fastest computers and the best program writers.” Algorithms can react in nanoseconds; human traders struggle to keep up. Under the current model, that speed gap is amplified when markets are shut and only a handful of players can set overnight reference prices. Continuous trading would lessen that asymmetric advantage by letting markets price in information immediately. Crypto and DeFi show the demand for always‑on markets The appetite for 24/7 trading is already visible in crypto and decentralized finance. Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange that runs continuous markets, drew significant interest from traders during periods when traditional exchanges were closed — notably during recent Middle East tensions. The platform topped $50 billion in weekly derivatives volume and generated $1.6 million in 24‑hour revenue at one point, even launching an S&P 500 perpetual contract. Those figures highlight demand for weekend and night access to tradable exposure in oil, gold, equities and more. Who benefits — and who gains from opening up? If trading truly goes 24/7, traders (especially retail and algorithmic participants) are likely to gain: they can respond as events unfold rather than being pinned to opening‑price shocks. Exchanges also stand to gain from additional fee pools. Whether that erodes brokers’ pricing influence remains an open question — but the structural incentives that let a few players dominate after‑hours pricing would be weakened. Bottom line Round‑the‑clock trading promises to bring equities closer to the continuous nature of crypto markets, reducing the after‑hours vacuum that has historically created opportunities for price distortions and alleged coordination. For traders, especially those without an army of low‑latency tools, that could mean fairer, more immediate pricing. For the middlemen who profited from closure gaps, it could mark a major loss of advantage — and a reshaping of how modern markets operate. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Analyst: ALT/BTC Bullish Crossover Signals Altcoin Season Could Top 2021
Bitcoin’s rally hasn’t sparked an altcoin season like 2021’s breakout — yet. Even as BTC hit fresh all-time highs over the past two years, Bitcoin dominance has stayed elevated, limiting room for altcoins to run. Still, many investors expect a turn, and one analyst says that when it arrives it could be even bigger than the last. Analyst Mark Chadwick told followers on X that altcoins are already flashing a major bullish pattern versus Bitcoin. The ALT/BTC chart has posted its fourth consecutive green monthly candle and, Chadwick says, this has confirmed a bullish crossover — the same technical signal that preceded the explosive 2021 altcoin run. Chadwick argues this cycle could top 2021 for several reasons tied to broader market conditions and infrastructure development: - Massive liquidity: Continued Fed injections into financial markets could fuel risk-on flows that help crypto assets appreciate. - Clearer regulation: The proposed Clarity Act, which would categorize crypto assets as securities or commodities, could bring legal certainty. - A perceived regulatory shift: Chadwick believes the SEC has taken a more pro-crypto stance under the current administration. - Institutional trading rails: Increased crypto activity from exchanges such as the NYSE and NASDAQ is improving market access and liquidity. - Real-world adoption moves: Fannie Mae has announced it will accept Bitcoin as loan collateral, and Mastercard is building crypto payment rails to enable blockchain-based transactions. Putting those factors together, Chadwick called the setup “of epic proportions.” If those catalysts materialize and the ALT/BTC momentum continues, the next altcoin season could outperform 2021 — with altcoins gaining against Bitcoin rather than merely following its lead. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
From Mini‑Budget to Bitcoin: Ex‑Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng Joins Stack BTC
Kwasi Kwarteng, the UK’s short‑lived chancellor from September 2022, is reappearing on the political and financial stage with a renewed focus on bitcoin, monetary history and long‑term economic strategy. Reflecting on the notorious mini‑budget in an interview with CoinDesk, Kwarteng conceded the policy rollout was rushed. “The mini budget was literally two weeks after we took office, it was just very, very rushed business,” he said — a period that began when he took office on Sept. 6 and was immediately complicated by the death of Queen Elizabeth II two days later. That compressed timeline, he argues, left little room for coordination or scrutiny. The result was severe: gilt yields spiked and the U.K.’s Liability‑Driven Investment (LDI) pension crisis was laid bare. Despite the political fallout, Kwarteng continues to defend the mini‑budget’s intent and uses the episode to highlight what he sees as deeper structural problems. He warned the U.K. risks a fiscal “doom loop” — spending more than can be raised in taxation — and cautioned that higher taxes can dampen economic incentives. He also lambasted the short‑termism that dominates both politics and markets. “Everything’s quarterly driven, people are either euphoric or freaking out. And actually, you’ve got to take a longer view,” he said. That longer horizon now shapes Kwarteng’s thinking on money and bitcoin. He says that while the Treasury and the Bank of England were aware of digital assets during his time in office, they considered the sector “incredibly small,” reflecting what he sees as a broader British reluctance to embrace crypto innovation. He contrasted that attitude with continental Europe, noting Paris is becoming “quite forward leaning on digital assets.” Kwarteng has also publicly pushed back against critics inside his own party. After former prime minister Boris Johnson called bitcoin a “Ponzi,” Kwarteng urged a more open‑minded approach to emerging forms of money rather than quick dismissal. Putting his views into practice, Kwarteng is now executive chairman of UK bitcoin treasury firm Stack BTC (ticker: STAK). The company holds 31 BTC on its balance sheet and has attracted political attention: Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has taken a roughly 6% stake in the firm. For Kwarteng, the move signals a shift from reactive policy decisions toward building what he describes as a more resilient monetary future grounded in long‑term thinking — an outlook he clearly believes should shape both public policy and private finance going forward. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
From Hoarding to Harvesting: Corporate Crypto Treasuries Pivot to Yield
Headline: Digital-treasury playbook shifts from buy-and-hold to yield generation By early 2026, more than 200 publicly listed companies reported holding digital assets—collectively managing over $115 billion on their balance sheets (DLA Piper, Oct 2025). The combined market capitalization of these firms climbed to roughly $150 billion by September 2025, nearly four times the prior year. Yet many still trade below the value of the crypto on their books. The message from investors is blunt: accumulation alone no longer justifies a crypto treasury. Investors now demand capital discipline, repeatable income and transparent reporting. Management teams have reacted with buybacks and new metrics such as “BTC per share” to demonstrate the incremental value a treasury adds beyond token price (AMINA Bank Research, 2026). The sector is moving from passive accumulation—what some call “DAT 1.0”—to active yield-first strategies, or “DAT 2.0.” Three distinct treasury models are emerging — each with different risk/return profiles, governance needs and technical demands 1) Protocol-native income: staking, Lightning and restaking - What it is: Use crypto to support networks and infrastructure—staking tokens for consensus rewards, running Lightning routing channels for fee income, or engaging in restaking where staked ETH secures additional services. - Why it matters: Native yields are attractive because they’re tied to protocol economics, and institutional-grade infrastructure can capture a premium over retail staking rates. - Examples: Bitmine Immersion Technologies reported over 3 million staked ETH by early 2026, with $9.9 billion total holdings and about $172 million in annualized staking revenue (SEC Filing, Mar 2026). SharpLink Gaming put $200 million of ETH into restaking via EigenCloud, chasing higher yields by securing applications from AI workloads to identity services (SEC Filing, 2025). - Risks and needs: Technical security, smart-contract and validator risk, and robust operational controls. Restaking especially requires careful governance to limit cascading exposures. 2) Market-driven income: trading, options and arbitrage - What it is: Convert the treasury into a trading engine—funding-rate arbitrage, basis trades, option-writing and other market-neutral income strategies. - Why it matters: These tactics can produce steady revenue independent of outright price appreciation, but they turn the treasury into a trading operation. - Example: A major Japanese-listed firm holding more than 35,000 BTC at end-2025 generated roughly $55 million in bitcoin income via options and saw operating profit jump >1,600% year-on-year. Yet it recorded a large net loss because of non-cash mark-to-market accounting effects under local rules (TradingView; Kavout, 2026). That gap highlights how operational cash vs. reported earnings can diverge—and why transparency and governance matter. - Risks and needs: Requires trading expertise, 24/7 monitoring, sophisticated risk controls and governance. Finding and compensating talent is a key constraint. 3) Productive balance-sheet capital: borrowing, stablecoins and private credit - What it is: Use crypto as collateral to borrow (often non‑recourse), receive stablecoin liquidity, and deploy that capital into higher-yielding short-duration private credit or real-economy lending. - Why it matters: This preserves long-term crypto exposure while generating recurring interest income—combining potential capital gains with predictable cash yield. - Mechanics: Borrow against holdings, lend the proceeds into diversified credit portfolios, manage liquidity and underwriting like a bank. This approach benefits from existing lending platforms and institutional-grade stablecoins. - Requirements and risks: Needs institutional lending infrastructure, strong credit underwriting, governance and counterparty due diligence. Leverage is controlled but still creates liquidity and counterparty risk. - Stablecoin role: By 2026 stablecoins are increasingly core to institutional plumbing—supporting cross-border payments and T+0 settlement (Foley & Lardner, Jan 2026). Coinbase Institutional projected that stablecoin market cap could reach $1.2 trillion by 2028 (Coinbase Institutional, Aug 2025), improving the viability of credit-deployment strategies. Hybrid examples and diversification - Firms are experimenting with mixes of the above. Galaxy Digital, for example, combines a digital-asset treasury with institutional services—collateralized lending, advisory and infrastructure—and posted a record adjusted gross profit of over $730 million in Q3 2025 (Mint Ventures Research, 2025). It has also repurposed its Helios mining facility into an AI compute campus under long-term contracts—showing how non-crypto, uncorrelated revenue streams can strengthen treasury resilience. Takeaway: yield, governance and operational discipline now trump headline holdings - Price appreciation alone is no longer a credible treasury strategy. Markets are rewarding firms that convert crypto exposure into sustainable income streams with clear governance and risk controls. - There’s no single “right” model—successful treasuries will blend approaches to match risk appetite, skills and infrastructure. But the direction is clear: passive hoarding won’t cut it. Yield generation, transparency and disciplined execution are becoming the primary metrics by which the market values companies with digital-asset exposure. - The winners won’t necessarily be the biggest holders; they’ll be the most disciplined operators. Important notice This piece is for informational and thought-leadership purposes and is aimed at businesses, professional counterparties and institutional market participants. It is not investment or financial advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset. Digital assets are volatile and regulatory regimes continue to evolve. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sources and forward-looking projections cited herein are third-party research and not endorsements. Seek independent professional advice before making any investment decision. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Yuan-Paid Oil & CBDC Rails Are Rerouting the Petrodollar — What It Means for Crypto
Headline: BRICS-led yuan settlements are already rerouting oil flows — and digital rails are the engine The shift away from the dollar is no longer a theoretical debate — it’s reshaping energy markets in real time, powered by yuan-denominated trade and digital payment rails that let countries sidestep the dollar entirely. Real barrels, real money: India and Iran lead the charge - In March 2026 Indian refiners bought roughly 60 million barrels of Russian crude, and a meaningful share was settled in yuan rather than dollars. Indian Oil Corporation reportedly paid directly in yuan for two or three cargoes, avoiding any intermediary conversion. That month marks the largest single surge of non-dollar oil settlement activity India has processed to date. - Iran is pushing the yuan into one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints. A senior Iranian official told CNN Tehran wants tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz to trade cargoes in yuan. An Iranian lawmaker said tolls have climbed to about $2 million per voyage, and lawmakers are preparing legislation to cement yuan-denominated charges. Digital rails: BRICS payment systems are moving huge volumes - The BRICS alternative payment ecosystem is already processing hundreds of billions in yuan transactions that bypass the dollar. The mBridge cross-border CBDC platform — which continued operating after the Bank for International Settlements stepped back — has handled roughly RMB 387.2 billion (about $55 billion), with 95% in digital yuan. - China’s CIPS network reportedly settled the equivalent of $245 trillion in yuan transactions in 2025, underscoring how large-scale yuan plumbing is quietly expanding. - Central banks are also diversifying reserves: the dollar’s share has fallen from about 71% in 2008 to 56.3% today, while many central banks have bought over 1,000 metric tons of gold per year for three consecutive years. Why policymakers are alarmed — and why others are cautious - Russian President Vladimir Putin framed the shift bluntly: “The US has weaponized the dollar.” - David Lubin, senior research fellow at Chatham House, says the perception of dollar “weaponization” helps explain why countries are exploring escape routes from dollar exposure. - Yet significant constraints remain. The BIS 2025 Triennial Survey found the dollar was on one side of 89.2% of all FX transactions (up from 88.4% in 2022). China maintains capital controls that restrict how freely the yuan moves across borders, and BRICS members have ruled out a shared currency — Russia confirmed in January 2026 that talks on a unified currency “have not taken place and are not taking place now.” Outlook: A long-term pivot accelerating - Some analysts, including ING, see de-dollarization as a multi-decade shift toward a multipolar currency landscape — perhaps a world where the dollar, euro and renminbi dominate different regions. But recent developments in early 2026 suggest the petrodollar’s decline may be accelerating faster than those decade-long forecasts, driven in part by India’s and Iran’s jump into yuan-denominated oil trade. What this means for crypto and digital payments - For crypto and digital-asset ecosystems, the rise of CBDC rails and alternative payment networks is a live signal that legacy dollar-denominated plumbing can be bypassed at scale. That creates new opportunities — and competition — for tokenized FX, cross-border stablecoins, and payment-layer innovation. At the same time, capital controls and policy constraints mean any transition will be uneven and regionally fragmented for the foreseeable future. Bottom line: De-dollarization is moving from talk to transactions. The combination of yuan-denominated oil deals, digital yuan rails and growing BRICS payment infrastructure is already shifting how energy is paid for — and that has consequences for global finance, reserves, and the digital payments landscape. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Analyst: PEPE Could Be This Cycle's Shiba Inu — But Traders Should Be Cautious
Headline: Analyst says PEPE could be the Shiba Inu of this cycle — but warns traders to be cautious During the 2021–2022 bull cycle, meme coins reshaped crypto markets: Dogecoin’s early surge reportedly climbed roughly 36,000%, and Shiba Inu followed with an eye-popping rally of more than 1,000,000%. That outsized performance has kept traders hunting for the next meme coin that can replicate those gains — and one candidate rising to the top of the conversation is PEPE. Crypto analyst Rexha took to X (formerly Twitter) to explain why PEPE might play Shiba’s role in the current cycle. Rexha’s thread traces yesterday’s patterns and today’s market movements to argue we’re seeing a repeat of the meme-coin lifecycle. Key points from Rexha’s take: - History repeats: After Dogecoin and Shiba’s runs, traders chased cheaper, faster chains in search of the “next big thing.” That migration produced big rallies — and a wave of scams, exemplified by tokens like SAFEMOON on BNB Chain, which later collapsed amid scam allegations. - Solana’s brief heyday: More recently many traders moved to Solana for low fees and speed. Rexha compares price charts and liquidity patterns, suggesting the Solana meme-trading “trenches” have been drained — projects like PumpFun pulled a lot of liquidity out of the ecosystem. - Return to quality on Ethereum: As speculative liquidity evaporates on alternate chains, Rexha expects capital and attention to flow back to Ethereum-based meme coins. In that scenario, PEPE is positioned to be this cycle’s “return to quality” leader, potentially running up in a way reminiscent of Shiba Inu’s second major phase. - A final warning: Rexha cautions that any renewed interest in cross-chain meme plays could lure traders into copycat schemes (what he calls a potential “PumpFun V2”) — a “Final Extraction” where late participants become exit liquidity. His takeaway: PEPE might be the big winner this cycle, but meme coins remain extremely high-risk and traders should exercise vigilance. Bottom line: The narrative that PEPE could be this cycle’s Shiba Inu is gaining traction among on-chain analysts — but history also shows the meme market cycles through euphoric rallies, speculative detours and painful exits. Traders should treat such calls as hypotheses, not guarantees, and manage risk accordingly. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news