Cryptocurrency Prices, Charts & Market Capitalizations

2 hours ago

Justin Sun Claims WLFI Backdoor Can Freeze Wallets, Sparking Token Rout

Justin Sun has publicly accused World Liberty Financial (WLFI) of embedding a covert “backdoor” in its smart contract that can freeze token holders’ wallets — an allegation that has intensified scrutiny of the project’s governance, on-chain activity and liquidity management. What Sun says happened - Sun says he originally supported WLFI because it marketed itself as a decentralized finance protocol aimed at expanding financial access. He now claims the project’s architecture is far less decentralized than represented. - In a statement, Sun alleged WLFI’s smart contract contains a “backdoor blacklisting function” that could let the team “freeze, restrict, and effectively confiscate” users’ assets without notice or recourse. WLFI has not provided a response in the material released alongside the claims. - Sun also says he was “the first and single largest victim” of the alleged blacklist, claiming WLFI blocked his wallet in 2025. He framed the action as a violation of investor rights and of basic blockchain principles around fairness and transparency. Governance and lending concerns - Sun criticized WLFI’s governance process, arguing votes that enabled these actions were neither fair nor transparent. He says key facts were withheld from voters and participation was limited until decisions were effectively pre-determined. - Separate on-chain analysis cited in the report raises questions about WLFI’s use of self-issued assets in lending and liquidity operations. The project reportedly committed substantial amounts of its own tokens and its USD1 stablecoin as collateral to obtain outside liquidity. Key on-chain and market figures cited - In February, WLFI reportedly used about $14 million in USD1 to borrow roughly $11.4 million in USDC. - Subsequent transfers and deposits raised WLFI’s total borrowing above $75 million. - WLFI’s presence on the Dolomite protocol expanded to constitute a large share of that protocol’s liquidity. - The USD1 pool utilization was reported to be near 93%. - WLFI moved roughly 3 billion tokens in early April. - Market moves reflect growing concern: the WLFI token dropped more than 21% over the past 30 days and traded below $0.08 as the accusations circulated. What’s next Sun has called on WLFI to “unlock the tokens and uphold transparency.” The allegations strike at the heart of DeFi’s trust model: if teams retain backdoor powers to freeze or blacklist addresses, that centralization can undermine investor confidence and invite regulatory attention. WLFI has not publicly responded to the specific claims in the report. Traders and observers will likely be watching on-chain flows, governance updates, and any official statements from the project for clarity. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

3 hours ago

Trump Threatens Hormuz Blockade — Oil Risk Rises, Crypto Braces for Volatility

Headline: Trump threatens naval blockade of Strait of Hormuz — U.S. vows interdiction, mine removal; global markets and crypto could feel the ripple Former President Donald Trump announced in a Truth Social post that the United States will begin naval action at the Strait of Hormuz, saying unresolved talks still left “NUCLEAR” as the central issue. He framed the move as an immediate response to what he called “WORLD EXTORTION,” and outlined a series of measures aimed at stopping Iran from exerting pressure via the critical waterway. Key points from the post - Blockade and interdiction: Trump said the U.S. Navy would start blockading ships entering or leaving the Strait of Hormuz and would seek and interdict vessels in international waters that have paid what he described as an illegal toll to Iran. He warned such ships would not receive safe passage. - Mines and mine clearance: The post said U.S. forces would begin destroying mines that Iran allegedly planted in the strait. - Escalation warning: Any Iranian forces firing on U.S. or commercial vessels, Trump wrote, would face direct retaliation. - Later policy aim: He said the U.S. ultimately wanted an “ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO IN, ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO OUT” regime but blamed Iran for blocking that outcome by raising fears about mines. - Claims and posture: The statement asserted Iran’s naval and air capabilities had been degraded and reiterated that Tehran’s nuclear program, not just money, remains the core dispute. - Lack of operational detail: The post provided no timeline, operational specifics, or names of partner countries Trump said would join the effort. Why this matters - Strategic chokepoint: The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important oil and gas transit routes; any military action there is closely watched by energy markets, shipping operators, and governments across multiple regions. - Market and crypto implications: Disruption or the risk of disruption in the strait tends to lift oil and broader risk premiums. For crypto markets, heightened geopolitical risk can trigger volatility — sometimes driving flows into perceived safe-haven assets like Bitcoin and other digital alternatives, and at other times prompting broad risk-off sell-offs that hit crypto prices and liquidity. Exchanges and tokenized commodity products could also face heightened counterparty and settlement risk if energy markets move sharply. What’s still unknown - No operational timeline or public confirmation of partner nations. - No independent verification of the alleged mines or the degree of damage to Iran’s capabilities. - Real-world escalation dynamics and responses from Iran and regional actors remain uncertain. Bottom line The Truth Social post signals a hardline U.S. posture toward Iran centered on the Strait of Hormuz and nuclear concerns, but it leaves many operational questions unanswered. Traders — in oil, equities and crypto — will likely monitor the situation closely for signs of escalation or de-escalation that could move markets. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

3 hours ago

Bitcoin Dips Below $71K as Trump Orders U.S. Navy Blockade of Strait of Hormuz

Bitcoin fell below $71,000 on Sunday as a sudden escalation in Middle East tensions rattled markets: President Trump ordered the U.S. Navy to join Iran in blockading the Strait of Hormuz. "Effective immediately, the United States Navy ... will begin the process of blockading any and all ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz," the president wrote in a social media post early Sunday. The move came hours after Vice President J.D. Vance said late Saturday that U.S. and Iranian negotiators had failed to secure an extended ceasefire following weekend talks in Pakistan. Market reaction was swift. Bitcoin, which traded above $73,000 for most of Saturday, slipped to roughly $71,500 after Vance’s comments. In the minutes following the president’s announcement, BTC slid further to about $70,900 — leaving it down roughly 2.5% over the past 24 hours. The Strait of Hormuz is a key maritime chokepoint; disruptions there have historically amplified risk sentiment across asset classes. Iran had already been preventing most maritime traffic through the strait since U.S. airstrikes at the end of February, a development that adds complexity to the latest blockade order. UPDATE (April 12, 2026, 16:51 UTC): Iran had already been blocking most maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz prior to the U.S. announcement. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

4 hours ago

Market makers flee onchain markets — GoQuant's GoDark brings ZK dark pools to Solana

Title: Market makers hunt for privacy — and flee public blockchains to protect trading playbooks Big liquidity providers are quietly abandoning transparent onchain markets because visibility is becoming a liability. In traditional markets, large traders have long relied on dark pools and off-exchange venues to hide orders and avoid moving prices; Bloomberg data shows that as far back as January 2025, more than half of U.S. equities trading already took place off public exchanges. Crypto, by contrast, has no real equivalent: every onchain trade and orderbook update is visible to observers, and analytics firms such as DeFiLlama and Arkham make it easy to trace activity. That openness is starting to bite. Market makers — the firms that supply the liquidity that keeps crypto markets functioning — report that their strategies are being reverse-engineered almost immediately. “On Hyperliquid, one of the top market makers told us they have to rotate their trading strategies every three weeks because they get copied,” Denis Dariotis, co-founder of GoQuant, told us. “That's the alpha problem.” The visibility problem creates two pressures. First, speed: publicly visible activity alerts competitors and front-runners. Second, reputation: large onchain trades are easy to trace, and when something goes wrong a firm can become the center of viral scrutiny — as with recent debate over Jane Street’s traced involvement in the Terra/Luna collapse. Trades that would be routine and private in TradFi suddenly become headline fodder onchain. GoQuant’s answer is GoDark, a Solana-based decentralized exchange planned to launch in May that aims to bring dark-pool-style privacy to DeFi. GoDark uses zero-knowledge proofs to hide trade details not only from other market participants but also from the node operators running the order book — in short, a matching engine where nobody in the system can see what they’re matching. That ambition raises practical questions. Zero-knowledge proofs are computationally heavy and add latency. GoQuant’s internal tests put GoDark’s matching times at 25–50 milliseconds. That’s fast compared with many current DEXs, where execution can run into the hundreds of milliseconds, but it’s still about an order of magnitude slower than the ultra-low-latency access available to firms co-located with centralized exchanges. For retail traders that gap may be irrelevant, but for the market makers GoDark needs to attract for liquidity, it could matter. Liquidity itself is another hurdle. A private exchange without volume is meaningless. GoDark plans to seed liquidity in a way similar to Hyperliquid’s HLP vault: users deposit funds that are deployed as market-making liquidity, with participants earning fees and priority on liquidations. That model has worked in a few cases (Hyperliquid among them), but many DEXs that relied on incentive-led liquidity have seen volumes collapse once incentives stop. Regulation may be the steepest barrier. Traditional dark pools hide pre-trade information but remain subject to post-trade reporting and regulatory oversight. GoDark’s design, by contrast, is structurally incapable of producing a full audit trail. The inclusion of automated OFAC screening is a nod toward compliance, but it may not placate regulators who have been pushing crypto toward greater transparency over the past three years. How regulators respond — and whether institutional participation will be restricted to jurisdictions with lighter oversight — is an open question. Finally, GoDark is not the same as GoQuant’s institutional product that shares the name. That institutional spot DEX, built with Copper and GSR, is slated to enter production next month and targets a narrower client base. The May launch is the retail-facing version. Why it matters: As markets mature, the tradeoff between privacy and transparency will decide whether large, sophisticated liquidity providers stay on public blockchains or retreat to private venues. Projects like GoDark test whether cryptographic privacy can recreate TradFi’s dark-pool functionality without sacrificing decentralization or attracting regulatory resistance. The outcome will shape where deep liquidity lives in crypto’s next chapter. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

4 hours ago

Fidelity's Timmer: Bitcoin May Be Forming a $65K Base as 'Paper Hands' Exit

Bitcoin may be carving out a base around $65,000 as “paper hands” get flushed from the market, says Jurrien Timmer, director of global macro at Fidelity Investments — and that matters for crypto traders watching macro signals. Timmer describes the current market as “another wild ride,” with a parade of strange headlines each week. Still, he told CoinDesk he’s relatively constructive: markets appear to be “pricing in some form of resolution” to the Iran-related tensions sooner rather than later. Why that matters for crypto and markets - Oil briefly surged above $100 a barrel after the flare-up, but the futures curve is in pronounced backwardation — contracts further out trade roughly $40 below the front month. That structure suggests the market sees the supply disruption as short-lived rather than permanent. - The S&P 500, which earlier was down about 9%, recovered to a drawdown nearer 1%, and credit spreads have stayed contained — signs that systemic stress is limited. - Gold and Treasuries have been moving together more than usual. Timmer attributes that to countries constrained in moving energy through the Strait of Hormuz selling ultra-liquid assets (gold and U.S. Treasuries) to raise cash, creating unusual correlations. A direct hit to crypto: the ceasefire headline Crypto markets got a quick lift after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, which sent oil tumbling more than 17% intraday and helped equities rally. WTI later rebounded to trade around $100. Bitcoin acting more like gold — and vice versa Timmer says bitcoin is behaving increasingly like gold, while gold sometimes trades with bitcoin-like characteristics. After bitcoin hit roughly $126,000 in October, fast-moving capital rotated out of crypto and into gold (visible in ETF flows). With bitcoin now down about 50–60% from that peak, Timmer argues most of the quick sellers — the “paper hands” — have been washed out. That leaves selling pressure largely absorbed and makes BTC technically more interesting. Key crypto takeaways from Timmer - Support: Timmer sees the $65,000 level as solid support and says bitcoin could be forming a base there — though a fresh catalyst will likely be needed to fuel the next leg up. - Positioning: With fewer weak hands left, the market is less likely to cascade lower on headline shocks. - Relative vulnerability: Gold, after a big run, may be more vulnerable to a pullback even as Timmer remains bullish on both gold and bitcoin. Macro context that matters to crypto investors - Timmer argues markets were already in a constructive backdrop before the Iran news: policy improvements (including a Supreme Court rollback of tariffs) and a lack of an AI-driven bubble helped. - Investor skepticism on AI and software valuations is healthy, he says — it keeps markets from overheating. - Risks remain: a worst-case escalation in the Middle East targeting Gulf energy infrastructure could be destabilizing. About 20% of global oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz; a prolonged disruption could trigger a stagflationary shock (higher inflation with weak growth). - Other watch-items: concentration risk in the “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks and interest-rate risk. The 10-year Treasury yield is approaching 4.5% and could head toward 5% — rising yields would be a key signal for markets. A trader’s mentality in choppy times Timmer frames volatility as an opportunity: disciplined investors who act as liquidity providers — rebalancing and buying when others panic — become price makers rather than takers. Fidelity’s approach is to lean into volatility and provide liquidity during stress, he says. His final point: hiding on the sidelines out of fear isn’t a strategy — diversified portfolios and active engagement during dislocations can deliver the best outcomes. Price snapshot At publication Bitcoin was trading in the low $70,000s. Timmer’s watchlist: $65,000 support, ETF flows, oil-market signals (backwardation), Treasury yields, and geopolitical headlines as the likely drivers of the next move. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

5 hours ago

Selig Pushes CFTC Authority Over Prediction Markets, Challenges State Bans

CFTC chair Mike Selig is pushing back hard in the fight over prediction markets, telling CoinDesk the agency will continue to defend its “exclusive regulatory authority” in court. Speaking at Vanderbilt’s Digital Assets and Emerging Tech Policy Summit in Nashville, Selig said the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s lawsuits against Arizona, Illinois and Connecticut are intended to make clear that federal rules — not state gambling laws — govern commodity derivatives offered on regulated exchanges. He pointed to a recent Third Circuit ruling as bolstering the agency’s position. “It doesn't matter if it's on sports, politics or anything else,” Selig said. “If it's a validly offered product within a CFTC‑regulated exchange, then we regulate that, and the states don't have the ability to nullify federal oversight and substitute gambling laws where derivatives laws apply.” Why it matters The dispute centers on whether certain prediction markets are derivatives subject to the Commodity Exchange Act — and therefore under CFTC jurisdiction — or gambling services that states can block. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC can regulate swaps and can prohibit types of contracts it deems contrary to the public interest (including those tied to war, terrorism, assassination, gaming or illegal activity). Selig emphasized that even when a public‑interest analysis is required, deciding that question remains within the CFTC’s exclusive remit. Legal strategy and scope Selig said the agency’s litigation campaign is intended to shore up the legal view that prediction markets offered on federally regulated Designated Contract Markets (DCMs) fall under federal oversight. He didn’t rule out further suits — noting Nevada and Massachusetts, which secured preliminary injunctions against prediction‑market platforms, could still be targets — and flagged the CFTC’s amicus brief in a consolidated Ninth Circuit case (which covers Nevada) that is set to be heard soon. Rulemaking and interagency alignment Beyond litigation, the CFTC is engaged in formal rulemaking to clarify how it will oversee prediction markets and said it remains open to public input on that process. Selig also addressed cross‑agency coordination with the SEC: the two agencies recently published a final interpretation and are developing a taxonomy intended to make it easier to determine whether a tokenized product is a security or a commodity. That framework, he said, should streamline self‑certification of futures tied to digital assets and reduce jurisdictional friction. “We should be very much aligned across agencies,” Selig added, noting that the guidance gives both markets and regulators clearer examples to follow. Selig will be speaking next month at CoinDesk’s Consensus event in Miami as the CFTC continues its dual track of litigation and rulemaking to assert federal control over prediction markets. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

#	Name	Price	1h %	24h %	7d %	Market Cap	Volume (24h)	Chart (7d)

No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query

Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps

Latest Crypto News